I think "coward" is appropriate. But let's not leave out "opportunist," "nitwit," "apparatchik," and "whiner." Those work as well.
Quote:
It's all bullshit if it conflicts with your agenda.
|
What the hell is "my agenda," you dolt? If you mean my point, I've already stated it. If you "conflict" with my point, then show me. Prove it.
Once again, my point is that you aren't truly interested in issues, nor do you really care about the well being of Americans. You aren't actually a conservative, you're a Republican. You support a party and its ambitions,
not its ideas. I tried to start a thread dedicated to policy comparison, and yoú called it stupid. Your brain can't handle it. The only thing you can handle is what the Right-Wing tells you to handle.
And I'm fairly certain, that rather than responding to this with a viable argument, you will most certainly reply with "You know what you are Kevin, I ams what I ams, and nobody will need to know what nothing is never anyway," or some other semi-cryptic bull crap that allows you to avoid defending your positions. You say I'm worse now at expressing my opinions, well what the hell are you? Your opinion is what Newsmax wants it to be, and that's sad.
To quote a poet and a scholar: "The problem is, Conservatives put the guy in office and he's not promoting Conservative policies."
With that said, these things don't seem to bother you, Ronnie.