First public gay high school set for NY

[CaptainBubba]

Forced segregation is illegal. I'm assuming this school is going to be segregated on an optional basis as otherwise it could not be done legally. I can see how youd get confused with my logic if this was 1961.

[Jeanette X]

Washrooms:
Male
Female
Male to Female
Female to Male
Not so hard, now is it?

[El Blanco]

I'm assuming this school is going to be segregated on an optional basis as otherwise it could not be done legally.

It is a public school that is only allowing gay students.

Tax payer dollars cannot go towards funding discrimination.

Where are you getting lost?

[CaptainBubba]

How can they determine wether you're gay or not? Thats ridiculous. If someone who is not gay wants to go to that school then I'm positive beyond a doubt they could get in.

Personally I don't believe in public education at all. I think the government in all its beaurocratic bullshit manages to turn education into a mandatory prison sentence for minors.

However, as long as we're agreed that the gov. is in charge then you have to also adress the fact that there are "magnet schools" which are public, yet only admit children who are notably more intelligent than most. Is this also not a form of segregation? Anyone can get in if they apply themselves. As anyone can get into this new gay school if they wish to.

There is a difference between mental and physcial segregation.

The difference being that you can't mentally segregate someone from an enviroment theyd actually want to be in within the bounds of these kind of systems. If you aren't gay then why would you want to go anyway?

As far as tax dollars go, yes, I agree, it is a waste. So is public education. I don't believe the gov. should have any say in education whatsoever. There are already school clubs devoted to homosexual studies, as well as religion. This new institution is simply the next step. However, if schools were completely privatized I'd see absolutely nothing wrong with this one.

From the tax dollar sense though I'd pretty much have to agree with you on eveything since I'm a fairly stern anti-big-gov. type of guy.

[El Blanco]

However, as long as we're agreed that the gov. is in charge then you have to also adress the fact that there are "magnet schools" which are public, yet only admit children who are notably more intelligent than most. Is this also not a form of segregation? Anyone can get in if they apply themselves. As anyone can get into this new gay school if they wish to.

Magnate schools are based on accomplishment.

The gay school only lets you in if you are gay. Again, its like a school that only admits white people.

[CaptainBubba]

I fail to see how thats legal. I'll have to wait for more info, but I highly doubt they would turn down anyone wanting to go, regardless of their sex.

They can't. :/

If schools were private this would happen anyway. The only possible problem is if they really do segregate, as the government should not be able to do that. My belif is that the school is intended for homosexuals but will not discriminate against people who wish to join.

If you can find something that says the school will absolutely not allow anyone who is not gay then I would expect to see this school never open or be quickly shut down.

[El Blanco]

If schools were private this would happen anyway.

As long as they don't get government funding, they can.

My belif is that the school is intended for homosexuals but will not discriminate against people who wish to join.

And you base that on.......

[FS]

Originally Posted by CaptainBubba

However, as long as we're agreed that the gov. is in charge then you have to also adress the fact that there are "magnet schools" which are public, yet only admit children who are notably more intelligent than most. Is this also not a form of segregation? Anyone can get in if they apply themselves. As anyone can get into this new gay school if they wish to.

Chairman Mike Long already said it. "Is there a different way to teach homosexuals? Is there gay math?" No, there isn't. Is there a different way to teach children who are notably more intelligent than most? Yes, there is. You can present them with greater challenges so they can put their intelligence to use.

Come on, so an all-white school can exist in name, just not in practice? Where's the logic in that? Why is there need to call a school all-something if you're not going to do anything with it? Regardless of that, there's the psychological effect. What black parents, except maybe the ones who are willing to use their children in an act of protest, would send their kids to a school that boldly states it's all-white? Similarly, with the social stigma still clinging to homosexuality and gender disorders I'm pretty sure few parents of heterosexual children will send their kids to this place.

It's beyond ridiculous, if you ask me. Political correctness getting way ahead of itself and taking a wrong turn somewhere. Do you really want to teach kids that to fight lack of acceptance, you have to hide yourself from it?

[Zhukov]

an opportunity to obtain a secondary education in a safe and supportive environment. ... We believe that success requires the ability to respect and value the diverse human community

I don't think that creating a brand new school is the right way to go about making a 'safe and supportive environment' for all students. Perhaps improving existing social standards instead of spliting from them would work better for everyone involved...

[Jeanette X]

Diverse? How in hell is all-gay school diverse?

[mburbank]

I don't know, I think Gay, Lesbian, Bi and Transgenered is pretty diverse. All they're missing is straight.

I think a better idea might be a magnet school based around principles of tolerance.

New York already has tons of schools that are speciffically selective. How far do you think you'd get suing the High school of Performing Arts for discriminating against advanced physics students?

While I personally have nothing major against this idea, if you achknowledge need for a gay school where gay kids can study and learn in a terror free environmentg, that's pretty much saying you have really bad problem that you tolerate and have no intention of fixing.

[CaptainBubba]

Having a school intended for a particular type of people serves the purpose of allowing people to choose who they wish to consort and learn with.

The gov. already controls who plays with who. The more choices, the less control the gov. has in who people have to hang out with. Thus I find nothing wrong with this. As long as the gov. insists on being in control of education they must provide an artificial educational competive enviroment so to speak.

If there are 2 schools in city x that are both the same, then what is one to do if he does not like one school for whatever reason? Becuase the gov. has a monopoly on schools, he can do nothing. However, in a privatized enviroment there would be many competing schools which all fill a somewhat specific niche in an enviromental, social, and academic sense.

I simply see this as an artifical version of that natural system. So stop bitching and moaning about your fucking tax dollars. I KNOW AND SO DOES EVERYONE ELSE. And believe me, I don't agree with that part of this, nor the entire tax funded education system.

[Mike]

Originally Posted by Jeanette X

Diverse? How in hell is all-gay school diverse?

Good point. Unfortunately, in the modern obsession over "political correctness" the term "diverse" has somehow come to mean "containing minorities" even if that minority is the only one to be found in a given environment.

[Zero Signal]

America has become so tolerant that it tolerates intolerance. :/

[Bennett]

I would like to hear the opinion of people who were openly gay in public schools, to find out how tolerant, accepting, objective and influential their peers and instructors were.

I feel kinda in-between on this issue... I think initially, it would be good for those students in the schools to be outside of a hostile environment until they and their peers are at a more mature age... I know it's not an ALL gay world, but I think young adults are more well equiped and generally more tolerant than teenagers. On the other hand, I feel like it is a step back, almost a defeat for the cause of acceptance... I want to have faith in people, that one day we could get past being hung up on someone's sexual orientation, but we've all seen how ugly and destructive the taunts of high schoolers can be.

One side note: I find it funny that people still make the claim, "Gay people don't bother me, as long as they're not so in-your-face about it." See also: I wouldn't mind gay people, if they weren't so gay!

[ItalianStereotype]

I wouldn't mind gay people....IF I COULD KILL THEM ALL.

[The One and Only...]

Originally Posted by CaptainBubba

Having a school intended for a particular type of people serves the purpose of allowing people to choose who they wish to consort and learn with.

Which only supports prejuidice. Why do think rascism has gone down so much since segregation was tossed?

[Ninjavenom]

What a ridiculous idea. Being gay is not an occupation, it can't be taught in public schools. Besides, do they think that opening a school that is publicly "All gay" is not going to cause more problems for the kids? When they get home, all the neighborhood kids will point and laugh at them because they go to Homosex Tech, or whatever, and the school will have its fair share of eggings and front yard Mustang burnouts. The only difference is that for a straight person to egg that school or to beat up one of the students (for a reason other than the student's sexuality) would be considered a hate crime. The kids will get harassed just as much as at any public school, because other people don't go away. Joey Gayguy is still going to get mocked for his choices no matter what school he goes to, it's a high school kid's M.O. to be ignorant.

[Mike]

Originally Posted by Bennett

I find it funny that people still make the claim, "Gay people don't bother me, as long as they're not so in-your-face about it."

That depends how you define "in-your-face". My first roommate in college really was in-your-face about it. He got all pissed off at me when I wasn't willing to display gay pride signs on our door and when my girlfriend was hanging out in the room he got all pissed off when he caught us making out claiming that we were doing it to make a statement against his homosexuality. He complained that I wouldn't let him display pictures of what looked to me like gay porn on the table that we shared.

I can honestly say that "gay people don't bother me, as long as they're not so in-your-face about it".

[CaptainBubba]

Originally Posted by The One and Only...

Which only supports prejuidice. Why do think rascism has gone down so much since segregation was tossed?

Segregation was not just tossed. It was outlawed. Effectively doing nothing as the gov. did not relinquish any of its power. It simply modified the ways it must implement it.

I have no problem with prejudice. I have no problem with racism. LEGALLY. I believe people should be able to be prejudiced and racist if they want to. Hell I know in some respects I'm highly prejudiced and even somewhat racist.

Personally I am against most racism however, and find it ignorant and repugnant.

Btw. Whats this about racism "going down"? Are you by chance, oh just a chance, completely and tottally pulling that arbitrary little tibit of info out of your freshly wiped cornhole? hmmm, could it be? hmmmm.

Heres a question for all of you: WHAT IS WRONG WITH GIVING PEOPLE CHOICES FOR WHICH THERE IS NO VICTIM IN EITHER CHOICE?

Please don't bring up tax dollars unless you read my previous post adressing that.

[The One and Only...]

Originally Posted by CaptainBubba

Segregation was not just tossed. It was outlawed. Effectively doing nothing as the gov. did not relinquish any of its power. It simply modified the ways it must implement it.

Segregation does not exist in public education today. By tossed I meant outlawed.

I have no problem with prejudice. I have no problem with racism. LEGALLY. I believe people should be able to be prejudiced and racist if they want to. Hell I know in some respects I'm highly prejudiced and even somewhat racist.

Personally I am against most racism however, and find it ignorant and repugnant.

The world would be a better place if rascism/prejuidice towards people did not exist. I think that is pretty much accepted, but if you feel the need for someone to explain why just ask.

Btw. Whats this about racism "going down"? Are you by chance, oh just a chance, completely and tottally pulling that arbitrary little tibit of info out of your freshly wiped cornhole? hmmm, could it be? hmmmm.

If you believe that rascism is as bad today as it was in the 50s, then I pity you. Seriously.

Here's a question for all of you: WHAT IS WRONG WITH GIVING PEOPLE CHOICES FOR WHICH THERE IS NO VICTIM IN EITHER CHOICE?

There is a victim. It's called society, and it's progression is being killed.

[CaptainBubba]

Originally Posted by The One and Only...

The world would be a better place if rascism/prejuidice towards people did not exist. I think that is pretty much accepted, but if you feel the need for someone to explain why just ask.

I think you've been brainwashed and are spurting out rhetoric gurgling that sounds exactly like what they tried to convince me in school. racism for the most part is, I agree ridiculous and ignorant. Personal prejudice is however often very accurate as it is based on ones own experiences after repeated incedince. As long as one stays open to the possibility of an anomily in his or her prejudice then its fine.

Do you want to make these two ways of thinking thought crimes? Oh wait they already are. And you buy it. Do you not see the error in thinking you can make someone change their mind by making it illegal to think a certain way?

Originally Posted by The One and Only...

If you believe that rascism is as bad today as it was in the 50s, then I pity you. Seriously.

Why?

But anyway, yeah, if you mean government enforced racism, sure and fine. But the stuff the common citizen says is pretty much the same shmeal with a little dash of public education brainwashing thrown in there.

Originally Posted by The One and Only...

There is a victim. It's called society, and it's progression is being killed.

So for society to progress we must enforce a specific way of thinking under penalty of forcable coercion? Do you even bother thinking for yourself, because I can tell you are not truly thinking about the words coming out of your mouth. You think they just sound pretty.

You seriously sound like you just got out of a D.A.R.E class or something and bought every fucking word.

I bet you think sex is fatal and girls get pregnant once more for every time you initiate heavy petting.

[Abcdxxxx]

Yeah but now who are all the closet cases going to beat up while figuring out their sexuality? This is horrible!

The truth is it's just a small program. I bet these kids have to go to other schools for gym class, and electives. Self imposed segragation is dangerous. It's setting a precedence that these kids are different and need to be different, which then shoots them in the foot when it comes ot equal rights. This is the rainbow curriculum gone haywire.

[Zero Signal]

Originally Posted by CaptainBubba

Personal prejudice is however often very accurate as it is based on ones own experiences after repeated incedince. As long as one stays open to the possibility of an anomily in his or her prejudice then its finel

"Prejudice" comes from "pre-" and "judge". I promise you that I am not prejudice. I do not pre-judge.

I judge.

[CaptainBubba]

Prejudice does not come from nowhere. It is the product of repeated occurences. You pre-judge constantly throughout the day. Otherwise how would you know that the next sandwhich isn't poisonous? It might be. But your prejudice tells you that most bread isn't full of cyanide.

The same idea can be applied to people to get "racism". From repeated incedince I have a prejudice (or racist idea) that black people are more often mesomorphs than white people. Which is a good thing for black people.