Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Jan 25th, 2006, 06:27 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggytrix
You'll be the first to go
You'll be the first to go
You'll be the first to go
Unless you thinkā€¦
DK are cliche, and that song was a novelty.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #27  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Jan 25th, 2006, 10:00 AM       
hahahah, your taste in music is even worse than mine!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
derrida derrida is offline
Member
derrida's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
derrida is probably a spambot
Old Jan 25th, 2006, 03:55 PM       
Kulturkampf:

Would it be accurate to say that your philosophy is at odds with the current economic paradigm, or just aspects of it?

You promote cultural change while strictly eschewing activism and revolution. Is there a criterion for distinguishing between "organic" and revolutionary change, or is proper political struggle determined with reference to a graded scale?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Jan 26th, 2006, 06:10 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by derrida
Kulturkampf:

Would it be accurate to say that your philosophy is at odds with the current economic paradigm, or just aspects of it?

You promote cultural change while strictly eschewing activism and revolution. Is there a criterion for distinguishing between "organic" and revolutionary change, or is proper political struggle determined with reference to a graded scale?
The philosophy of kulturkampf is not an inherently applicable to economists, but I would say that the idea of the traditional cutlure being fine and requiring not a change, and that the people are self-sufficient and persoanlly responsible and that there is no need for a social revolution (but rather the need to social reaction), I would say that it would tend towards Capitalism.

So I am not at odds with it.

Though I do dislike soem of the corporate subsidizing and tariffs that the government maintains.

Your last paragraph is hard to understand.

It is a revolution in only as much as it is a counterrevolution.

It is a movement only in a smuch that it is a movement to return to a previous state.

It's reactionaryu.

There is no graded scale and there are no super-lofty goals, merely a call to return to the simple truths of oru times, and a call to maintain a connection to our heritage.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #30  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Jan 26th, 2006, 09:27 AM       
"Your last paragraph is hard to understand."
-SummerKampf


Ah-hah.

A-ha-ha-hmmph... snort!

A haHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHOHO
HOHHOHOHOHOHOHEEHEHEHEEHEEHEEHEEGHAHNUHHAHN
UHHAHAHAHAHAHHARHARHARHAHAHAHAHA
HAHHAHHAAAAAAA....UHHAH....uhah.

ha. hee.

haha.




ha.


hoooo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.