Fueling the fire...

[ziggytrix]

Originally Posted by KevinTheOmnivore

Furthermore, I find it pretty amusing that you think my lack of an obsessive hatred for Karl Rove should stand as a litmus test of my "self-professed" liberalism. I find that to be pretty telling.

I find it pretty telling that you find it so amusing. If you read what I said, I explained exactly what I thought you were saying, and asked how someone becoming "above the law" because of past witch hunts could be percieved as a good thing. Particularly when said person is a conservative strategist and you have described yourself in the past as a liberal. If you can't see why I'd find that confusing then you are too focused on winning an internet argument, when I'm not even fucking arguing.

You read WAY too much into my statements.

I dunno, Rove very well may be full of shit. If he's guilty of a crime, then I think he'll be punished. That's the whole deal to me.

Rove is almost certainly guilty of a crime, as is a good 3/4 of Washington. The real question is whether he was sloppy enough to get caught and if the crime was big enough to warrant punishment.

[ziggytrix]

Originally Posted by KevinTheOmnivore

I don't think that result would be a good thing. I said that if this case just sort of fades away, that could potentially be the good thing.

Furthermore, I would like to add that I am 100% in agreement with you here. I just didn't understand that that's what you were saying.

and just for good measure

[ItalianStereotype]

this entire "scandal" is intensely boring.

[KevinTheOmnivore]

Originally Posted by ziggytrix

If you read what I said, I explained exactly what I thought you were saying, and asked how someone becoming "above the law" because of past witch hunts could be percieved as a good thing. Particularly when said person is a conservative strategist and you have described yourself in the past as a liberal. If you can't see why I'd find that confusing then you are too focused on winning an internet argument, when I'm not even fucking arguing.

You read WAY too much into my statements.

No, I don't at all. I think the problem is that you like to cut and run on your statements.

I understand what you were confused about, you mis-read it. I get that. I still say it's pretty funny that a scandal over Karl Rove, being pretty much devoid of any sort of ideological significance, comes down to such "good vs. evil" implications for you. Hence the "HA HA".

[kellychaos]

I find you quite tedious, Kevintheomnivore.

[KevinTheOmnivore]

quite.