Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Aug 24th, 2005, 08:41 AM        Abstinence program funds are suspended
Hey, teaching about abstinence is ok in my book, but this group sounds hilarious. I can't help but think they'd make a fantastic episode of South Park.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas...are_suspended/

Abstinence program funds are suspended

US halts support after ACLU suit
By Jonathan Saltzman, Globe Staff | August 24, 2005

The federal government has suspended funding of a nationwide faith-based abstinence program, three months after the American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit in Boston arguing that the public contribution of more than $1 million violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

The US Department of Health and Human Services yesterday notified the Silver Ring Thing program, which has held at least four events in the Boston area since 2002, that it has ''not adequately separated" its religious component from its secular message urging middle and high school students to forgo premarital sex.

Federal funding of the organization, which is based in suburban Pittsburgh, will be halted until the government is confident that the program is obeying department rules, said the letter from Harry Wilson, associate commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau. The Silver Ring Thing has until Sept. 6 to submit a plan showing that it separates its abstinence message from its encouragement of Christian values.

The Silver Ring Thing received $1.1 million from the federal government in fiscal 2003 and 2004 and has received most of a $75,000 allocation for the current fiscal year, said Steve Barbour, a spokesman for the Administration for Children and Families.

The ACLU yesterday applauded the government's decision, saying the Silver Ring Thing -- which sells silver rings for $15 to teens who take a vow of abstinence -- has been using tax dollars to bankroll religious indoctrination.

''It shows that they [the government] took our lawsuit seriously," said Lorraine Kenny, the public education coordinator for the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project based in New York. The Silver Ring Thing, she said, had used federal funds ''to basically put on a religious road show across the country."

Its next event in the Boston area is scheduled for Oct. 15 at a middle school in Weymouth, according to the Silver Ring Thing's website.

The ACLU, which had been preparing to seek a court order to halt funding, plans to put its suit on hold to see what action the Silver Ring Thing takes to comply with federal guidelines.

Denny Pattyn, the founder of the Silver Ring Thing, declined to comment, saying he only gives interviews to newspapers ''that handle conservative causes pretty decently, which your newspaper, obviously, doesn't."

In May, his group said in a statement that the Silver Ring Thing's goal is to teach adolescents about the risks of sex, including teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, and that the organization believes it was using federal dollars properly.

The Silver Ring Thing has held dozens of events in various parts of the country in the past three years, according to the group's website.

Nikki Dingle, 19, who attended a Silver Ring Thing event as a senior at Melrose High School, said yesterday that the federal money helped the organization spread a worthwhile message, and she is upset that funding is being suspended.

Dingle attended a gathering held at Merrimack College in North Andover with a close friend and members of her Catholic parish. Partway through the event, she said, organizers allowed the young people to participate in two group discussions about chastity, one rooted in Christian values, which she participated in, and another that had no religious theme.

''People could choose whether they wanted to relate it to God or not," she said. ''Because of that choice, it was fine."

The ACLU acknowledged in its suit that Pattyn, who leads the events, allows teenagers to participate in a secular discussion group. But the Massachusetts chapter of the ACLU, which filed the suit in Boston on behalf of the national organization, said that young people feel pressured to participate in the religious discussion; those who want to participate in the secular discussion, for example, have to switch rooms, while those in the religion-based discussion group can stay in their seats, the suit said.

The federal government said in its letter to the Silver Ring Thing that its review of the group's activities included visits to an event -- held in Canton, Ohio, said Barbour -- and to the organization's headquarters. The officials concluded that the Silver Ring Thing was violating rules that prohibit community-based abstinence education programs from getting federal funds if they ''engage in inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization."

Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at jsaltzman@globe.com.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Immortal Goat Immortal Goat is offline
Now with less sodium!
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Immortal Goat is probably a spambot
Old Aug 24th, 2005, 08:46 AM       
Yeah, I've heard about the Silver Ring Thing group, and I also heard that statistically, the people who pledge something like that are about 40% more likely to engage in premarital sex, and about 80% of those people won't use condoms.

So, in short, the group is useless, and not only that, detrimental to teen society.
__________________
I like snow. If winter's going to be cold anyway, at least have it be fun to look at. Probably why I was with my ex for so long...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Aug 25th, 2005, 11:03 AM       
Sure, but you get a ring!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Aug 25th, 2005, 02:46 PM       
I think the point of the rings is so that when you do have sex you're supposed to feel guilty about wearing it so that you don't and they can find you and kill you or something.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Aug 25th, 2005, 03:37 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immortal Goat
the people who pledge something like that are about 40% more likely to engage in premarital sex, and about 80% of those people won't use condoms.
Why would someone who pledges abstinence be 40% more likely to have sex than someone who won't make the pledge? That makes no sense.
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Aug 25th, 2005, 03:42 PM       
I think he's mistaken. I think the study shows that teens who pledge abstinence are more likely to get involved in other "not quite sex, right"-type activites, like oral sex, sodomy, and jello wrestling.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Miss Modular Miss Modular is offline
Little Monster
Miss Modular's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Haus of Gaga
Miss Modular is probably a spambot
Old Aug 25th, 2005, 06:20 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinTheOmnivore
"not quite sex, right"-type activites, like oral sex, sodomy, and jello wrestling.
__________________
Live From New York, It's Saturday Night!!!: http://notready4primetime.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Big Papa Goat Big Papa Goat is offline
Mocker
Big Papa Goat's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Missouri
Big Papa Goat is probably a spambot
Old Aug 25th, 2005, 08:03 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggytrix
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immortal Goat
the people who pledge something like that are about 40% more likely to engage in premarital sex, and about 80% of those people won't use condoms.
Why would someone who pledges abstinence be 40% more likely to have sex than someone who won't make the pledge? That makes no sense.
Chicks dig virgins
__________________
Ibid
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Immortal Goat Immortal Goat is offline
Now with less sodium!
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Immortal Goat is probably a spambot
Old Aug 28th, 2005, 12:54 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggytrix
Why would someone who pledges abstinence be 40% more likely to have sex than someone who won't make the pledge? That makes no sense.
It's like the old argument about a kid and a hot toaster. If you see a kid near a hot toaster, and you tell him not to touch it, what is the first thing that kid is going to do? They are going to touch it. The more you make something out to be something that needs to be stayed away from without really explaining it, like the Silver Ring Thing program does, the more desirable you make said activity. The kids are more curious due to their lack of education on the subject along with their natural youthful rebellion.
__________________
I like snow. If winter's going to be cold anyway, at least have it be fun to look at. Probably why I was with my ex for so long...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.