Quote:
Originally Posted by DAN SPERBER
When you are told something, the simple view of what happens would be: 'ah! These are words, they have meaning,' and so you decode the meaning of the word and you thereby understand what the speaker meant. A more realistic and, as I said, also a more interesting idea is that the words don't encode the speaker meaning, they just give you evidence of the speaker's meaning. When we speak we want our audience to understand something that's in our mind. And we have no way to fully encode it, and trying at least to encode as much as possible would be absurdly cumbersome. Linguistic utterances, however rich and complex they may be, cannot fully encode our thoughts. But they can give strong richly structured piece of evidence of what our thoughts are.
|
In terms of literature rather than speech, local culture notwithstanding, how important is the choice of wording in conveying (or encoding) our thoughts. Does an extensive vocabulary necessarily convey deeper meaning? Does a mellifluous flow to even common words, as in verse, strike something in your conscious more so than choice of vocabulary? How much does the combination and/or order of the chosen words matter? One of the more obvious examples I can think of is Hemmingway in
The Old Man And The Sea. Though composed of short, choppy sentences, the novel made complex ideas more lucid to an universal audience.
[quote"DAN SPERBER"]From the point of view of the audience, a speaker is providing rich pieces of evidence, which we interpret in a context of shared background knowledge, drawing on the common cultural, on the local situation, on the ongoing conversation, and so on. You construct a complex representation helped by all these different factors. You to end up with something which will have been strongly guided, sometimes guided in an exquisitely detailed manner, by the communication, by the words used by the speaker, but which end up being a thought of your own, relevant to you, a recognition, to begin with, of what the speaker meant, from which you extract what is relevant to you.[/quote]
How important to the author/speaker is local culture in projecting the ideas, through the connotations of the chosen words. Aren't some of the most profound ideas those which can be made to appeal to the broadest of audiences?