Sep 30th, 2006, 01:09 PM
The cabinet by three new Prime Minister Shin Abe started. Many criticisms “discussion of merits distribution of honors” “close friend club” “circle Cabinet” “team Abe” and so on, seem like those which point out the kind of impression which gathered just flesh fell.
By the way, there is “a majority” in one of principle of democracy, but there is no basis that large number always is correct. Because as for the person who can do correct judgment as the specialist in the respective decisive thing plan, really it is not particularly many is.
On the other hand, seeing in the long term, when it is beneficial for the citizen, there are also times when the sovereign of nation lowers judgment from general viewpoint bravely.
Philosopher Plato, depending on majority, decides phenomenon, criticizing “group of people foolish politics”, you appraised dictatorial politics which is by the wise man, but also and dictatorial politics how is dangerous, is about history to teach.
So when you think, because it is not group of people foolish politics which is left to large number, the alone wise man dictatorially does politics, it is not, you think that it means that namely, the government which has one bodily sensation in the kind of form where the wise man unites the team with network is most desirable.
When of Abe Cabinet of this each time is thought with such viewpoint, it is rather close to ideal type, or the air does whether it is not to become the Cabinet which can have the desire which gets near to ideal.
Commenting Abe Cabinet, there were also some which point out “brittleness”, but perhaps the impression certainly you cannot refuse. But, speaking conversely, from first firmness coming out, rather than becoming firm, it is something which can be expected future degree of growth largely. The baby “it is brittle”, being soft in spite, when also absorption power is excellent, it probably is the same thing.
A little when just you appraise individually, as for it has tried to working functionally with the “prime minister advisor” as 5 you think that it is very much good thing. In order to do the movement where the prime minister is effective small turn, the function which carries out the role like the lube being necessary, always new information and judgment material must be replenished especially concerning the important topic “of national safe” “education problem” “kidnapping problem” and so on. As for putting the Yamatani collar child on the advisor of education playback charge you think even among them that it is large correct answer.
In addition, also the fact that Sanae Takaishi inaugurates in regard to education as charge minister of state of little child conversion man and woman joint participation being should call large correct answer, that, on the ─ Yamatani's Takaishi line you think it becomes the power which holds down the communism idea, “gender free” in man and woman joint participation policy.
As for Takaishi it is the case that the Okinawa northern innovation and the like you take charge, but '[azu] [a] [tatsukusupeiya]' (the lucky occurrence transmission corporation, 1989) and the like doing from the impression which read the consecutive book, that quantities which overlook can look at Japanese politics from experience of the American Congress duty it is the few outstanding talent I think.
Of course each minister of state having personality, it is to be able to expect it means, but after it should feature, combining, advocating “technology establishment”, being very heavy meaning in Yukitugu Omi who is stacked research becoming financial affairs minister of state.
Japan energy war of the petroleum and the like is serious state without either the resource. Overcoming this, in order for Japan to continue economic growth, it means that leap of technology by any means becomes necessary. Also application of the atomic energy should be reconsidered probably. Fearing vaguely, if only it sidesteps, the fact that we fear rather is the atomic energy.
If the varieties you write, there is no cutting, but I in the latest formation of a cabinet discernibly, those like “latent power” are felt. The criticism which designates this as the “close friend Cabinet” (?)It is, but on the other hand, very the kind of formation of a cabinet which reserves in the faction which (before the Koizumi Cabinet) is done until now, “the close friend Cabinet” in bad sense is not, probably will be?
In the first place, the Cabinet is something to which directivity should agree in true sense, there is no wall of heart mutually and the fact that relations are good is major premise. Problem probably is whether or not each minister of state can show personality feature from special standpoint.
The grandchild of bank trust mediating/helping former prime minister becomes the prime minister, there are some which make the weight of the Japanese modern history feel in the current Cabinet where the grandchild of former Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida becomes Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Because former Prime Minister Yoshida originally with diplomat, Minister of Foreign Affairs was served in postwar difficult time, to Taro's Aso which succeeds the DNA diplomacy ability it probably is to be be inherited character.
Anyhow, topic has accumulated current Japan. Upper House election and the like is not immediate topic. On the other hand it can show the fact that Abe administration becomes the profit of nation and the citizen sufficiently if is, you think that it becomes the largest power very that in House of Councillors selection.