Philosophy of mockery?

[Helm]

I don't need to tongue anybody's arsehole for praise or recognition.

Tongue my asshole a bit though, will you?

leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Oh come on. Just a little bit.

Helm, I'm rather fond of you, and I don't really want to start some pissy internet bitch slapping contest, so I'll simply leave off with explaining my position.

Bye! Be seeing you. We'll call you when we, uh, see the flames of presumption again. Or when we need a rim-job.

[Demogorgon]

I suppose I was looking for a certain response by asking about mockeries phiosophy. I just want some damned opinion. This thread has become three pages long and the amount of opinions taked up less than a page. We spend so much time bitching at each other over such stupid little affairs and correcting the menial while completely avoiding the matter at hand. I know I'm not that well spoken, nor do I claim to know much at all...

Mockery is often a form of crude criticisation (sp?). Some consider that mocking is only a way of venting your problems upon others and often a 'bully effect'. Others think that through the rigors and sometiems pain of ciricization, we are improved. Can someone be a little on topic please?[/i]

[Zhukov]

Sorry, you've taked up too much time already.

[mburbank]

Oh, laws, you were looking for a philosiphy of the VERB 'mock' as it is practiced at the place 'I-mockery' as opposed to an actual comprehensive philosiphy of the place itself! Why didn't you SAY so. I apologize for my previous shortness. This is soemthing I'd be happy to give you my opinion on.








It is my opinion you are tool.



Now clean out your rice bowl before you give yourself food poisoning.