Why the left hates talk radio

[VinceZeb]

I'm glad you are easily amused, Kelly.

[mburbank]

Vince, the coffee machine is not your boss, no one believes for an instant you have friends and she'd be more than sorta you're girlfriend if you'd just use a bicycle pump instead of trying to inflate her yourself.

I thought your joke about Jeanine was hysterical though, 'cause see, she's woman, and scrubbing toilets and making steaks are the sorts of things a mook like you think women should spend there time doing. It's almost as funny as your Jew jokes. Oh, wait, they're pretty much exactly the same joke.

Know what? I hate to think of all the porch steps you could have been burning on while trying to tell those jokes.

Cause you're a bag of dog shit.


Get it?

[kellychaos]

Originally Posted by VinceZeb

I'm glad you are easily amused, Kelly.

I'm not THAT easily amused. It takes a LOT of fat to amuse me.

[Immortal Goat]

Vinth, it is amazing how wide the brush that you use to paint us liberals is. I enjoy listening to talk radio. I enjoy a good debate on things dealing with controversial issues such as the death penalty, abortion, religion, just about anything. What I do NOT enjoy are over-opinionated egotistical blowhards such as yourself always sounding like you are the only person on earth that is right. I take a more "middle of the road" stance to politics, but I am sure that you find something wrong with that, too. I await your poorly worded comeback.

[Jeanette X]

Originally Posted by VinceZeb

Now Jean, I know you like to try to get into the big-people arguments, but when you are making a failed attempt to seem mature, a toilet goes unscrubbed and a steak uncooked.

Better to be young and naive than old and mentally retarded. I am the only person who remained neutral in the Great Flame War that you are losing, and actually attempted to debate you civilly, because I thought you might be somewhat intelligent underneath your blustering. I really am naive sometimes. :/

[AChimp]

It's just the Internet Naivety, Jeannette. It goes away once you have been exposed to... the Goatse.

[Immortal Goat]

You rang, AChimp?

[Protoclown]

That was YOU in the picture???

[Immortal Goat]

wait, he didn't say Goat, did he? He said Goatse. What the hell is that?

[Alxcipher]

That article was horrid. It is just like reading the federalist fucking papers. Commentary all based on principle and over-simplification. All these "left or right" division are entirely inert for any communicable purpose.

[VinceZeb]

Truth hurts, huh?

[ItalianStereotype]

Originally Posted by Immortal Goat

wait, he didn't say Goat, did he? He said Goatse. What the hell is that?

one more reason why I-Mockery needs an age requirement.

[Alxcipher]

Vince, you think a some vague assertions that lack any evidence are the "truth"? Is ignorance really bliss, if you believe that you're dumb enough to believe anything. I personally would appreciate a higher burden for what I label as "the truth".

[VinceZeb]

Did Boortz set out to write the Articles of Confederation? No, he did not. He had 700 word-limits to his columns, so he must write something that will get people to look at the page and hopefully click on an ad and buy something. It's something called BUSINESS.

And besides, if you want to validate the arguments or disprove them, go to your local public school. I have seen the evidence myself, and he is right on target with a LOT of these "starving" children. Do you know the govt considers "starvation" when you have missed ONE meal in a week? If that were the case, most of the fucking country would be starving. Bet you didn't know that.

[mburbank]

I didn't. I have no idea what you are refering to when you say our government conciders missing a meal day 'starvation'. Educate me.

[VinceZeb]

Annie Sullivan couldn't educate you, Max.

[mburbank]

No one can 'education' you.



What you mean is you heard that thing about starvation, immediately belived, have no idea what the source is and can't even envision how you find back up.

[AChimp]

STEPTH TO BEING VINTH
1. Pull random facth out of ass.
2. Refuth to back them up.
3. Inthult other perthon for knowing nothing of talking what I am about.

wait, he didn't say Goat, did he? He said Goatse. What the hell is that?

GOATSE

[VinceZeb]

I'm not here to be your fact book. If it's so fucking important that I am wrong, go prove I am wrong.

[mburbank]

Didn't they teach you in chool that you can't prove a negative?

The ONLY way to prove the government never said any such thing ever would to post absolutely everything they had said.

It's your fabrication, you're the guy who's constantly sounding out your blowhole about how you can back stuff up. Put your money where your mouth is. I say you're a big fat liar OR you credulously swallowed a big fat lie you WANT to believe becuase it suits your hate filled poor me whiny spoiled attitude.

And Vinth. I'm curious. That's the very first time you edited a post becuae I pointed out you'd coommitted a stupidity. Could it be my constant encouragement and urging you to take some small measure of care in how you communicate is finally taking effect?

Vinth Historians need not worry. I copied the original line. I bet you know where to find it.

[kellychaos]

Originally Posted by VinceZeb

I'm not here to be your fact book. If it's so fucking important that I am wrong, go prove I am wrong.

It doesn't work like that. The burden of proof is on the initiator of the statement, otherwise it's just so much cyber-diarrhea. There have been very few threads in which you have provided a link or quote wherein your "proof" is anything other than the opinion of one of your conservative superheros. I value their opinion just slightly more than yours ... which is to say zero. Facts and figures, Vinth!

[VinceZeb]

What do I get for showing you sources?

[mburbank]

Slapped around over at Newsfilter?

Or maybe looking like marginally less of an ill informed chump ready to believe any old thing that feeds his dislike of the poor?

[Alxcipher]

Did Boortz set out to write the Articles of Confederation? No, he did not. He had 700 word-limits to his columns, so he must write something that will get people to look at the page and hopefully click on an ad and buy something. It's something called BUSINESS.

So is it "business" or "the truth". You tell me idiot?

And besides, if you want to validate the arguments or disprove them, go to your local public school. I have seen the evidence myself, and he is right on target with a LOT of these "starving" children. Do you know the govt considers "starvation" when you have missed ONE meal in a week? If that were the case, most of the fucking country would be starving. Bet you didn't know that.

Firstly I wouldn't see anything similar as I'm in a completely different country. And if he is "on target" with his rather baseless assertions then why is it so hard for you to back them up? And why would it be someone else's responsibility. I think you're way to eager to believe this Boortz character and not eager enough to consider the worth of his mere "opinion".

[Immortal Goat]

AChimp, I don't know if I should thank you for clarifying that you were NOT referring to me when you said GOATSE, or if I should continue to pound my head onto my keyboard to try to rid my memory of any and all knowledge of that photo's existence.