Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Nov 10th, 2003, 01:55 PM        WHITE HOUSE TO TAKE BALL AND GO HOME
White House Puts Limits on Queries From Democrats

By Dana Milbank
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 7, 2003;

The Bush White House, irritated by pesky questions from congressional Democrats about how the administration is using taxpayer money, has developed an efficient solution: It will not entertain any more questions from opposition lawmakers.

The decision -- one that Democrats and scholars said is highly unusual -- was announced in an e-mail sent Wednesday to the staff of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. House committee Democrats had just asked for information about how much the White House spent making and installing the "Mission Accomplished" banner for President Bush's May 1 speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln.

The director of the White House Office of Administration, Timothy A. Campen, sent an e-mail titled "congressional questions" to majority and minority staff on the House and Senate Appropriations panels. Expressing "the need to add a bit of structure to the Q&A process," he wrote: "Given the increase in the number and types of requests we are beginning to receive from the House and Senate, and in deference to the various committee chairmen and our desire to better coordinate these requests, I am asking that all requests for information and materials be coordinated through the committee chairmen and be put in writing from the committee."

He said this would limit "duplicate requests" and help answer questions "in a timely fashion."

It would also do another thing: prevent Democrats from getting questions answered without the blessing of the GOP committee chairmen.

"It's saying we're not going to allow the opposition party to ask questions about the way we use tax money," said R. Scott Lilly, Democratic staff director for the House committee. "As far as I know, this is without modern precedent."

Norman Ornstein, a congressional specialist at the American Enterprise Institute, agreed. "I have not heard of anything like that happening before," he said. "This is obviously an excuse to avoid providing information about some of the things the Democrats are asking for."

Campen's e-mail wording suggests the policy may extend to other inquiries about the functioning of the Executive Office of the President, but the immediate targets were the spending committees. For years, those panels had a strong bipartisan tradition in which the majority party generally joined the minority in tough oversight of the administration.

Brookings Institution government scholar Thomas Mann said the Democrats have little ability to challenge the decision. "This is just one of many instances where Republicans have a legal basis for what they're doing, but it violates long-standing norms," he said. All the Democrats can do, he said, "is carp."

The White House said it is in discussions to reach an amicable compromise. "There have been staff-level discussions about ways to better coordinate requests from Congress," said spokeswoman Ashley Snee. "It was not the intent to suggest minority members should not ask questions without the consent of the majority."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Nov 10th, 2003, 02:03 PM       
is it official then that we have a republican corporate dictatorship topped by puppet bush?

i hear thier working on reinstating the draft now.. whew, i'm glad i'm approaching the ripe age that gets me out of being recalled.

of course hitler called people from the ages of 13 to 50 to the service, so there is no safe age if the corporate soldiers arent enough. :/
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote
  #3  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Nov 10th, 2003, 07:34 PM       
I have glasses and fallen arches, so I don't need to worry.

That said, I doubt they will reinstate the draft, and this is far from a dictatorship. Or even a totalitarian state.
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Ninjavenom Ninjavenom is offline
Lord Felch Demon
Ninjavenom's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Ninjavenom is probably a spambot
Old Nov 10th, 2003, 10:35 PM       
I totally didn't read the article, but i thought Max's title was hilarious.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Nov 11th, 2003, 09:54 PM       
oh no, thier not going to reinstate the draft.. thier just reinstating the draft boards for no reason .. pfft.
http://truthout.org/docs_03/111003I.shtml

if read some gov docs on this saying they have nothing in the works for the draft.. yea right.. all the vets ive talked to from wwII, korea, and viet nam say there is no reason to talk about draft boards unless thier planning on reinstating the draft.

i imagine that the plan is to wait until after
a) another attack on our soil
b) the election
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote
  #6  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Nov 12th, 2003, 12:10 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
I have glasses and fallen arches, so I don't need to worry.

That said, I doubt they will reinstate the draft, and this is far from a dictatorship. Or even a totalitarian state.
It is however a complete disregard towards the legislative branch of our government. Many conservatives in the House and Senate have also complained about this White House's propensity to "go it alone" and forget that we have three branches of government.

Of course dipshit Blue dogs like Zell Miller will endorse Dubya no matter what, but these conservative legislators have egos that probably surpass our executive's. This White House needs to be more responsive, or it will shoot itself in the foot....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
VinceZeb VinceZeb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
VinceZeb is probably a spambot
Old Nov 12th, 2003, 07:56 AM       
Zell Miller is great. His new book is an eye-opener.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Nov 12th, 2003, 10:36 AM       
Sure, but you like 'He-man', right?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.