Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Old Jun 15th, 2005, 10:06 PM        So, uh, the AFL-CIO sorta died today.....
Or at least sort of maybe. There appears to be a catch 22. Sweeney can hold on to power in July, but then the largest unions in the group will leave.

The only way they will save themselves now is if they elect Andy Stern. Stern is a bit of a tool, however I sort of like SEIU.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...061401344.html

Fraying House of Labor

By Harold Meyerson

Wednesday, June 15, 2005; Page A25

The dissident unions of the AFL-CIO are meeting in Washington today to announce that they are building a halfway house.

The Change to Win Coalition-- and boy, is that ever a provisional-sounding and utterly clunky name -- will begin life neither entirely within nor without the AFL-CIO. One of its founders, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the AFL-CIO's largest affiliate, passed a resolution last weekend authorizing its top officers to take the union out of the federation when they deem it appropriate. All signs indicate that will happen soon.


The other founders -- the Teamsters, the food and commercial workers (both million-member unions), UNITE-HERE (the apparel and hotel workers union) and the laborers -- have each (well, all but the laborers) made noises about decamping from the federation unless more money is devoted to organizing and incumbent President John Sweeney is replaced at the AFL-CIO's July convention.

But Sweeney and his allies command a clear majority of the federation's unions, and they insist that all the dissidents except SEIU are bluffing. The food and commercial workers need the help of the AFL-CIO to organize Wal-Mart, they argue; UNITE-HERE cannot risk the withdrawal of massive union deposits from Amalgamated Bank (the nation's one labor bank, which UNITE-HERE owns).

For their part, the dissidents insist that the price of a Sweeney victory may be the dissolution of a unified labor movement. "Sweeney loses by winning," says one dissident leader. "He can win the vote at the AFL-CIO convention, but so what? It's a voluntary organization. We can leave."

In a sense, the leaders of American labor -- people who have spent their lives at the bargaining tables -- are engaging one another in a massive game of chicken. But such games can take on a life of their own, with all manner of unforeseen consequences. The Change to Win Coalition may begin as a modest group devoted to coordinating some joint organizing efforts by its member unions. But if those efforts grow, so will the financial demands on its members, which will then find themselves paying dues to both a full-fledged federation, so long as they stay in the AFL-CIO, and a new group that could look more and more like a federation rival. Under those circumstances, predicts the dissident leader, "We're not going to pay double dues."

If nothing else, today's declaration ensures that the federation's coming convention -- originally conceived as a celebration of the 50th anniversary of the merger of the AFL and the CIO -- will be a bitter affair. It was never wholly clear what there was to celebrate: At the time of the 1955 merger, 35 percent of the U.S. workforce was unionized; today that figure stands at just 12.5 percent. Unions are surely not the primary authors of their own demise, but to the extent that they are responsible, their decline can be traced back to a fateful error made at the time of the merger.

Fifty years ago CIO (and United Auto Workers) President Walter Reuther argued that the newly merged federation should be charged with organizing those sectors of the economy and regions of the country where labor had little or no presence. George Meany, then president of the AFL, countered that the individual affiliates should have that responsibility, and it was Meany's position that prevailed. Over the decades, however, most unions stuck to meeting the needs of their existing members. At first, secure in their existing labor markets, they considered the tasks of organizing the Sunbelt and the new economy beneath them. In time, with their own sectors shriveled and with the how-tos of organizing all but forgotten, they realized that such tasks were beyond them.

The seven or eight of the 57 unions in the federation that can and do organize are found on each side of the current divide; what separates them most are their differing assessments of whether the 71-year-old Sweeney, who has served as AFL-CIO president for the past decade, can make the kind of changes needed to reverse labor's decline. The SEIU is right in its initial contention that the movement must be restructured so it can organize again. (Merging unions that lack organizing capacity is hardly a sufficient condition for new growth, but it's a necessary one.)

But Sweeney's defenders are probably right, too, in arguing that splitting the movement would fragment the force required to organize Wal-Mart or dethrone Tom DeLay in 2006. "This is a movement based on concerted action," one federation staffer says. "Unity is the most practical operating principle we have."

But not today in Washington, where the new watchword of American labor has become, "Workers of the world, divide."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Old Jun 15th, 2005, 10:08 PM        btw.....
"WHATEVER! THE LABOR MOVEMENT DIED YEARS AGO, MAN! LABOR ONLY HURTS JOBS, MAN!"

Just thought I'd get that inevitable response out of the way immediately, so we can maybe talk at the table with the grown ups.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
El Blanco El Blanco is offline
Mocker
El Blanco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Old Jun 16th, 2005, 01:09 AM       
You know what might help? GETTING THE MOB OUT!

Or how about not having a leadership thats even bigger scumbags than the corporate CEOs they are supposed to protect their members from? Might that help?

In case you didn't notice, my time as a teamster was't the most pleasent.
__________________
according to my mongoose, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Old Jun 16th, 2005, 01:15 AM       
SEIU organizers tend to be these horrible, condescending pricks. But like my buddy who worked for dep. of sanitation in NYC used to say, "that asshole did a pretty good job of dealing with the assholes from the city." It sometimes takes one to know and deal with one, me thinks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
Old Jun 16th, 2005, 02:02 AM       
WHATEVER! THE LABOR MOVEMENT DIED YEARS AGO, MAN! LABOR ONLY HURTS JOBS, MAN!
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
El Blanco El Blanco is offline
Mocker
El Blanco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Old Jun 16th, 2005, 03:02 PM       
Problem for me was, our local made a deal with the company alright. Unfortunatly, it was for themselves while we got shafted.
__________________
according to my mongoose, anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.