assuming that this is actually the case, then wouldn't that imply that the implication here isn't that a neutrino is actually faster than the speed of light, but simply that our accepted model for the speed of light has been off this entire time? why has no one proposed this skepticism? why are they more quick to accept the back-in-time theory?
because thats ridiculous to assume off of one anomalous test? besides didn't they get results saying it went faster and others saying it went slower -- so that explanation would be impossible.
also did scientists really say that it went back in time or is it just idiots who said that? I would think a better explanation would be that time slowed down -- the speed of light stayed the same :O
but i dont think a scientist should really say either of those things