Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Dec 24th, 2003, 09:25 AM        Global Warming: a POSITIVE???
This article touches on more than just that concept, but it raises the point:

Three Cheers for Holiday Lights
by Rob Bradley

Rob Bradley is president of the Institute for Energy Research in Houston, an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute, and author of Climate Alarmism Reconsidered (Institute of Economic Affairs, 2003).

Environmental activists usually critical of electrified America must have mixed emotions this time of the year. Though it is a season of good cheer and goodwill toward all, it is also a time of conspicuous energy consumption. To many people, America the Beautiful is at her best in December when so much of the nation is illuminated by billions of tiny stringed light bulbs. Holiday lighting is a great social offering -- a positive externality, in the jargon of economics -- given by many to all.

While a few energy doomsayers such as Paul Ehrlich rile against "garish commercial Christmas displays," few of today's headline grabbers (Arianna Huffington, where are you?) have attempted to stir up debate over the generator-hours devoted to making the season glow. Indeed, holiday lighting seems a dazzling exception to the activists' goal of reducing discretionary energy usage.

But if holiday energy guzzling can be overlooked, why not excuse outdoor heating and cooling, one-switch centralized lighting, and instant-on appliances that "leak" electricity, not to mention SUVs? Prancing around to turn on individual lights or waiting for the photocopier to warm up wastes the scarcest and one truly depleting resource: A person's time.

Known world oil reserves are more than 20 times greater now than they were when record keeping began in the 1940s; world gas reserves are almost four times greater than they were in the 1960s; world coal reserves have risen fourfold since 1950. Transient developments, often political, can drive supplies down and prices up, but the raw mineral resource base is abundant -- and expanding in economic terms thanks to an inexhaustible supply of human ingenuity and exploratory capital.

Record energy consumption has been accompanied by improving air quality. Urban air quality is a third better today than in 1970. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reported that air emissions of the criteria pollutants declined by 25 percent, as energy usage increased by 150 percent. Further air emission reductions are expected, but they will not be accomplished by forcing higher prices or inconvenience on consumers. Future reductions will be accomplished with market incentives, technological improvement, and regulation based on sound science, not alarmism.

Should good citizens think twice about holiday lighting, given global warming and other suspected climate changes supposedly caused by increasing atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide? Hardly. A moderately warmer, wetter world, whether natural or anthropogenic, such as experienced in the 20th century, is a better world. Carbon dioxide from the combustion of fossil fuels "greens" the biosphere through the well-documented carbon fertilization effect. But most importantly, the wealth created from affordable, plentiful energy provides the primary means for societies to improve the environment. In the final analysis, wealth produces environmental health, which explains why increasing energy usage and environmental improvement have gone hand in hand in the Western world.

There is much to be thankful for this holiday season with our energy economy. But thoughts about the less fortunate should be with us, too. The World Energy Council estimates that 1.6 billion people lack electricity for lighting, heating, cooling, or cooking. A Christmas tree for us is likely to be firewood for those living in energy poverty. For fully a fourth of the world's population, there could be no greater holiday gift than affordable electricity, explaining why the developing world has flatly rejected proposals from environmental elites to forsake future energy usage in the quixotic quest to "stabilize climate."

Energy consumption is good -- for comfort, convenience, and even celebration. May one and all in good conscience enliven this holiday season with lights aplenty. With sources of conventional fuels steadily expanding and energy technologies rapidly advancing, Americans can look forward to even more energetic celebrations and shared goodwill in the holiday seasons ahead.
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Zhukov Zhukov is offline
Supa Soviet Missil Mastar
Zhukov's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tasmania
Zhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's army
Old Dec 24th, 2003, 10:32 AM       
My next door neighbours dog died from overheating!

I'm not wearing a shit!

EDIT: Well I'm not. But I meant to say shirt. Sometimes my keyboard misses letters and I have to go back and fill them in...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Dec 24th, 2003, 11:50 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhukov
I'm not wearing a shit!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
camacazio camacazio is offline
Mocker
camacazio's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
camacazio is probably a spambot
Old Dec 24th, 2003, 03:14 PM       
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read. How on earth is it a better world to completely alter the planet's biological systems if it just means us being a little warmer? It completely fails to touch on the other side, i.e. how it would alter agricultural and animal growth/reproduction patterns or the melting of polar caps. I mean, it made way more sense to argue whether global warming will happen or not--this article takes the dumbest stand I could possibly imagine on the issue, saying that it's okay to be lazy uncaring slobs because the consequences are convenient.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Dec 24th, 2003, 04:17 PM       
I feel the same way about altering the planet's natural economic systems just because the effects are convienent.

Seriously, you overestimate how bad a global rise in climate is. No apocalyptic melting of all the icecaps would occur; possibly some melting, but not that much. Futhermore, the effects on animal reproduction would be minimal; we are talking about something like a 5 degree F change here. You also need to consider the carbon fertilization effect.
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Dec 25th, 2003, 02:52 PM       
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
I will not make fun of little kids. I will not make fun of little kids.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
MatthewCleveland MatthewCleveland is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
MatthewCleveland is probably a spambot
Old Dec 29th, 2003, 03:04 PM        Global Warming *IS* Catacylasmic
I am new to these boards but I jsut read this post and was infuriated. Glabal warming is a cataclysmic device that will plummit us into a *ice age*. A 5 degree increase in global tempetures along with causing hte West Antartic Ice Sheet to plummit into the ocean (Pieces of it are already breaking awya at alarming rates) but it will increase evaporation dramaticly. While in the short run this will create a a few century's of tropical paradise, the increas ien cload cover will reflect solar radiation. This will send out tempetures further downwards. Once we past a critical point in whihc the global thermometer is balanced at, cool summers will not be able to melt away the winter's ice and snow. This increase in snow and ice over the northern Eurasian and North American continents will (like the cloud cover) reflect solar radiation. This will only cause us to have cooler summers harder snow falla nd more ice coverage. The world's tempature is an extremely delicate thing, and changes are sure to plummit us into ice ages like has happened time and time again in the Earth's history.

However one must take what I said with a grain of salt, these effects like all geological and meteological process takes centuries, mellenia, but none the less if this process of industrial pollution continues we are increasing the chances of a global extinction that will wipe out most land life. Global wamring *IS* bad.....

If you have anyhting to say feel free to IM or e-mail me.

Matthew Cleveland
__________________
To be wise is to udnerstand you know nothing.
Wisdom is the tolerance of others.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Dec 29th, 2003, 05:11 PM       
How about looking about the moral idea of overconsumption in general? There are children in Africa with no Christmas lights and they get along just fine ... granted, some of them are muslim but that's beside the point.
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Dec 29th, 2003, 05:20 PM       
Where are you getting your info?
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
MatthewCleveland MatthewCleveland is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
MatthewCleveland is probably a spambot
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 10:03 AM       
I've read a few books on the matter, but now that I've gone back and looked the only one I still have on me is "A Short History of Nearly Everything" by Bill Bryson. I've read several articles but I don't keep track of them. However no one could really be sure what could happen there are way too many factors, Earth's "wobbles", Messinian Salinity Crisis, and so many other factors we haven't even discovered. The point is e jsut don't know and can't know so we need to stop playing with it and conserve.
__________________
To be wise is to udnerstand you know nothing.
Wisdom is the tolerance of others.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 10:39 AM       
Natural Economic Systems. Woosh. Hooo-boy.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 04:06 PM       
It's about as asinine as saying Natural Environmental Systems. Humans are a part of nature, after all.
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
AChimp AChimp is offline
Resident Chimp
AChimp's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The Jungles of Borneo
AChimp is probably a real personAChimp is probably a real person
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 05:33 PM       
Actually, I think it can be argued that we aren't technically part of nature anymore since we're never exposed to it and have the technology to kick its ass.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 07:30 PM       
Nature encompasses everything. It is far more than just a woodland forest.
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Helm Helm is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Fuji
Helm is probably a spambot
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 10:20 PM       
Chimp is on the right track. We're not a functional part of nature anymore, and we haven't been such theoretically since made our first weapon. We're the only animal that found it's way at the top of the food-chain due to increasingly effective use of our intellect. We have a reactionary relationship with nature instead of a interactive one.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
FartinMowler FartinMowler is offline
Banned
FartinMowler's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: incoherant
FartinMowler sucks
Old Dec 30th, 2003, 10:20 PM       
Quote:
Nature encompasses everything
This guy is funny....You obviously have never eaten at a mall in Buffalo.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.