Quote:
Originally Posted by El Blanco
They are trying to keep face. Let them blow wind. Our Ofio class subs are more than enough to make sure its just shit talking.
|
they're doing more than trying to keep face. if they wanted to keep face and not further marginalize themselves, they would reign in these mouthpieces who, in effect, speak for the government. that's not limited to just some extremist general either, this has been an ongoing problem.
and if we're going to make sure that they're just talking shit, I say let's be flashy about it. send a Nimitz carrier group.
Quote:
They are eyeing Taiwan and Japan for their economic infrastructures. Wiping the cities off the face of the Earth kind of puts a dent in that. Its a much better idea to send in troops that can actually occupy the centers.
|
it's dangerous to assume that they won't strike out of nationalist pride. Taiwan is nothing more than a rebellious province to them, I don't doubt that they'd strike just to cow them. besides, they tend to threaten Taiwanese and U.S. military forces with missile strikes more than the cities. if we were to intervene, however, I have no doubt it would escalate far beyond that.
Quote:
Pakistan is currently both sides, like they and India did during the Cold War.
|
this sounds reasonable. however, I can see how their favor can easily tip towards China. our relationship with India, our involvement in the war on terror, China providing technological and economic benefits are all working against us.
Quote:
S
any action against south korea is going to involve north korea as well. now, the two militaries combined are more than enough to overwhelm our forces in the area, especially since we are otherwise occupied elsewhere. I'm pretty sure the Chinese would be willing to support their Korean allies if a war were to ever occur, as our response would be limited.
|
You'd be surprise just how effective a few B2s can be. Again, we wouldn't have to directly engage them. I also think you're overestimating just how happy the PRC is with Kim Jong Il. They've yanked the leash on him several times when he ran his mouth too much.
Quote:
As cynical about them as I am, even I have to hope they'd be more active in that. If they let china run through a sovereign nation simply because they like the trade relationship, the orginaztion is sunk at that exact moment
|
what do you think the Security Council would have to say? Russia and China are both permanent members. besides, what did the UN do during, say, the Darfur massacres? weren't French economic interests involved there?
Quote:
You are seriously over estimating that relationship.
|
not as much as you might think. a common enemy and a common goal will do a lot to unite even the most ardent opponents. weapons treaties, economic agreements, unified anti-US sentiments, really, I think you underestimate that relationship.
Quote:
I'd say Western Europe and the United States has just as much a chance to be a powerful influence in Russia as China.
|
agreed, but right now it's looking more like Russia is going to slide back into authoritarianism and into China's arms. like gay romance. I've personally written Russia off, but if we can continue to be the greatest economic and political influence on the Russians, I'll be quite happy.
Quote:
Yes, but little by little, the human rights are increasing.
|
how so? one of the greatest backwards steps happened less than twenty years ago. I know twenty years is a long time for us, but not so much so for a country with little political evolution. and even more recently we see things like the crackdown on Falun Gong. economic freedom and human rights are definitely related, but not enough to make me think that China is becoming progressive.
Quote:
The can say it all they want. They realize it just isn't going to happen.
|
they have a rapidly modernizing and absolutely bloated military, a huge working class, and are in an upward trend in education, especially in science and math. we have some serious problems that we need to fix if we want to stay on top. I'm not saying that the Chinese are in ANY position right now to be preeminent country in the world, but they WILL be in a position to supplant us if we're not careful.
Quote:
I don't think you remember our doctrine from the Cold War. Mutually Assured Destruction. I have no idea how being turned into a radioactive wasteland suits them.
|
I remember it quite well, actually. I have no idea how being turned into a radioactive wasteland would suit them, but they balk at the idea. they think that they could survive such an exchange and that we couldn't. China is like the Sicilian in the Princess Bride. they think they've outsmarted us.
Quote:
Just how would they escape unscathed?
|
I'm not saying they would, but they're willing to take it that far.
Quote:
An enemy they are going to have to coexist with. I'm not saying roll over and take their shit, but you gotta realize that a fight with them over some hardliner blowing wind just isn't to anyone's advantage.
|
it's not just one hardliner though. it's pretty obvious that China is aggressively positioning themselves to become THE power in Asia, and most likely they'll continue to try for world dominance. right now they're doing it quietly; bait with money, threaten with violence, play it off politically, etcetera, but I have no doubt that they'll become more belligerent as they grow stronger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helm
I guess China's superiority or inferiority in terms of market has very little to do with if it's threatening or not. Just by existing, and by growing, it's a threat to the US. This is what I read behind Italian's posts in this thread, that constant fear of opposition, an urge to preemptively destroy a potential threat. Power for Security, to quench the primordial need of safety.
|
interesting.
I don't really want to see China destroyed, but I do want to see the US maintain her position as the world's most powerful nation. in fact, I want to incorporate other nations like Canada, the UK, etc. into, not necessarily the US, but into a relationship different than any that currently exist. China is a threat to the current order or the world, a country that's fairly morally and ethically bankrupt. one that won't shy away from murdering millions and destroying the standard of living for countless others to acheive their goals.
this probably wasn't very clear, but I'm on my way out the door. I'll probably clarify later.