Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Rez Rez is offline
YOU GUYS ARE DOING GREAT
Rez's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Davis, CA
Rez is probably a spambot
Old Dec 21st, 2005, 12:28 PM        I.D. gets K.O'd
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4547734.stm

the way he ruled, you'd think they tried to crash a hot-air balloon into the white house and call it art.
"breathtaking inanity"
i wonder how transparent these fuckers must have been for a bush-appointed judge to rule like this.
or maybe he's actually got a sense of, y'know, ethics.

You can read the ruling as a PDF: http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmil...miller_342.pdf

More from http://www.nature.com/news/2005/0512.../051219-8.html


Quote:
"The judge simply ignored the evidence that intelligent design does not rely on a supernatural creator," says Luskin. He predicts that the ruling will pique people's interest in intelligent design: "When you tell students that they can't think about something, they are going to want to think about it."
i like his connection between a religiously-motivated idea and drugs. an idea backed by "if i can't wrap my head around it then it's obviously not true" and argued IN COURT seems to have a fair bit of substances behind it as well.
i look forward to the day when children get accosted during recess and are asked "hey, you want a theory of how we came to be that "they" DON'T want you to know? i got what u need, man, it's all here."




who the fuck are these people?
"come on you guys, i mean look at it, it's so huge! i dont think science could do this, y'all!"
__________________
Thanks, Moon!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Big Papa Goat Big Papa Goat is offline
Mocker
Big Papa Goat's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Missouri
Big Papa Goat is probably a spambot
Old Dec 21st, 2005, 03:32 PM       
intelligent design doesn't rely on a supernatural creator, but it does rely on an infinitely complex intelligent entity that cannot be observed in nature
__________________
Ibid
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Cosmo Electrolux Cosmo Electrolux is offline
Stone Pants Rabbit
Cosmo Electrolux's Avatar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: In your distant memory
Cosmo Electrolux is probably a spambot
Old Dec 21st, 2005, 03:34 PM       
it's creationism, man...it in no way resembles science.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.