|
Mocker
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
|
|

May 22nd, 2003, 05:01 PM
"it bears mentioning in the light that it was upon watching something on the subject that made me wonder about it's pschological relation to something else."
So you are making a comparison then. Play the man for a moment, and admit to it, you snivelling little shit.
"and read over my last post, I am saying that there are people who no matter what the issue at hand is immediately equate higher taxes with welfare and other things they don't consider themselves responsible for."
Well for fuck's sake, there are people that fuck livestock animals too. Should we use them as the text subject for questions regarding hetero sexuality? After all, both are having intercoarse. Thats about as consistant as using your precious minroity of taxpayers to represent the views held by the majority of conservatisms who lobby with similar interests.
"yes, the government would be the perpetrator. Is that invalid that they would voice their concerns to the institution that they think wronged them?"
Were your dropped, or violently thrown, upon the ground as a baby? Under this 'logic' we should make requests of rapists not to commit further acts of aggression against women rather than the police. Look, you're wrong. Not just a little, but toally and utterly. It really is that simple, you're not going to save any face on this issue, you may as well just accept it and move on. This theory is invalid.
|
|
|
|