Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDipshit
TheLeader can use whatever information he pleases, all I did was give an indepth history of who FactCheck is, which foundation they are tied too, and who worked for them in the past (OBAMA).
|
In an attempt to discredit them by saying they are bias towards Obama.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDipshit
Even if WND says they are "conservative" that's completely irrelevant because it's the information in the article I was speaking about not the altruistic nature of World net Daily.
|
This is a valid point because you tried to discredit FacCheck by saying they were bias but then use your own bias source.
Psst... This makes you a hypocrite.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDipshit
TheLeader has every right to be distrustful of whomever he pleases BUT he used a discredited talking head teleprompter reader from the "right" persuasion in a ham fisted attempt to discredit my article. You can't just say a person who is a villian and attach his or her name to anything you want to attack on the basis of nothing. The article I posted was about the Obama health care monstrosity. NOT ABOUT BILL O'REILLY. They have nothing to do with each other.
See? get it?
|
He was pointing out how O'Relly writes for WND and that if they will let just any bias fuck write for them how much can they really be trusted. Meanwhile FactCheck doesnt let just anyone write for them.
Do YOU see? Do YOU get it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDipshit
Drew Zahn agreed with Factcheck.....Not WND......WND is a news website.....Drew Zahn is a writer. She doesn't speak for her entire paper.
|
They hired his ass there for in a way he does represent the company. This is why people get fired for acting like fuck twats when working for a company. BECAUSE ITS A REFLECTION OF THE COMPANY.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDipshit
No, what I said is that people can absorb any information they wish but one must come to an independent conclusion on them.
|
Again. NO THATS NOT WHAT YOU SAID. What you said was...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDipshit
FactCheck is absolutely unreliable for numerous reasons. First reason is that it's run by a private family (Foundation's are used by the rich for social manipulation and tax avoidance on their large sums of money),
|
As in people shouldnt absorb info form them. You then went on to give some crap from WND implying people should absorb info from them.