|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
Apr 7th, 2004 02:48 AM | ||||
Supafly345 | It's geared towards flakey, desperate women. | |||
Apr 7th, 2004 12:06 AM | ||||
Brandon |
Quote:
The article did appear in Psychology Today, though, so I doubt it was geared toward the average, impressionable reader. |
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:58 PM | ||||
Perndog | It didn't say that, but it sure implied it; think of the average, impressionable reader swallowing two paragraphs about how being in a relationship is better than being single, without hearing the other side of the story at all. | |||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:45 PM | ||||
Brandon |
Quote:
|
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:15 PM | ||||
Anonymous | Stop it | |||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:09 PM | ||||
Emu | seriously | |||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:08 PM | ||||
Anonymous | Stop staring at me. | |||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:06 PM | ||||
Emu |
Computers make better girlfriends than women. And sex is a lot tinglier. fuck |
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 11:05 PM | ||||
Perndog | It's promoting codependence by saying that most people need a committed partner to live happily or be fulfilled ("Committed partners have it all over singles"), meaning any single and lonely person who takes this advice to heart will never be satisfied without such a relationship. | |||
Apr 6th, 2004 10:53 PM | ||||
Anonymous |
AW SHIT GUYS HERE IT COMES ![]() |
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 10:51 PM | ||||
Gurlugon |
Quote:
![]() |
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 10:49 PM | ||||
ArrowX |
Quote:
|
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 10:39 PM | ||||
executioneer |
"being in a relationship" apparently means "being codependent" :/ -willie |
|||
Apr 6th, 2004 01:47 PM | ||||
Brandon | How the hell is that "promoting co-dependence?" The article just gave the positive aspects of being in a committed relationship. It didn't say that spouses have to drop all autonomy just because they need to make compromises. | |||
Apr 6th, 2004 01:03 PM | ||||
Perndog |
Quote:
![]() |
|||
Apr 5th, 2004 11:16 PM | ||||
CLAspinster | On a loosely related note, has anyone read "Urban Tribes"? | |||
Apr 5th, 2004 07:49 PM | ||||
Brandon |
Quote:
I think that bit about "connecting to the human condition" pissed off the egoists, though. |
|||
Apr 5th, 2004 06:53 PM | ||||
Protoclown | I didn't really see the point of the article to be promoting co-dependancy at all, rather what I got out of it was that nobody should expect a perfect relationship to fall into their lap. We are unhappy because of what we expect. | |||
Apr 5th, 2004 04:30 PM | ||||
kellychaos | Well, that would do it. :/ | |||
Apr 5th, 2004 03:25 PM | ||||
ziggytrix | I was married once. It was OK til she had an affair, then shit got weird. | |||
Apr 5th, 2004 01:20 AM | ||||
sadie | tl,dr | |||
Apr 4th, 2004 08:54 PM | ||||
The One and Only... | The Fountainhead will work, too. All of Rand's novels involve the "Randian hero" - the individualist genius who is shunned by society. | |||
Apr 4th, 2004 07:33 PM | ||||
Perndog |
Someday I'll read Atlas Shrugged and I'll understand that. I read The Fountainhead, though. Be a little more versatile, use more references from that. Oh, and this is obligatory: You're a nerd. |
|||
Apr 4th, 2004 01:19 PM | ||||
The One and Only... | If ever there were a perfect moment for a :johngalt, it would be now. | |||
Apr 4th, 2004 12:18 PM | ||||
Perndog |
This article advocates co-dependence, as if no one can live a happy life as a bachelor or a spinster. So what if statistics show that married people live longer. Doesn't mean their lives were any better, and I'd rather have a great seventy years than a mediocre eighty. Not to mention their statistics were probably 55%/45% in favor of married people or something. Fuck'em. Finally, BULLSHIT if you think this society is hell-bent on individual achievement and autonomy. Everyone wants you to join a club, support the community, etc. etc. etc. Autonomy gets you weird looks. |
|||
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |