|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
Feb 3rd, 2006 04:47 AM | ||||
Kulturkampf |
LOL, how is it hilarious I listen to Oi music? And by Oi music, I do mean Oi music; do not get me wrong on the issue and make you think that by Oi I mean punk bands that are slightly inspired by the classics and over-use the word in the name of seeming cool.... I mean, the absolute, ultimate, quintessential international sensation of Oi music in the must unapologetic and amazingly beautiful way. Favorite bands = The Clash (not Oi, I know) Vanilla Muffins The Oppressed Pluton Svea Jocke Karlsson (only one album, the singer of Pluton Svea, Pro Patria, and now Pitbull Farm) Legion of St. George The Headhunters (the Oi project of Ultima Thule) Legion Of St. George Angelic Upstarts Sham 69 And even a liberal Oi band like Los Fastidios still tickles my ears (yes, angelic uptarts are also generally liberal). |
|||
Jan 31st, 2006 05:34 PM | ||||
Dole |
'catholic samurai' 'conservative punk' Hmm. And Kulturekampf listens to Oi. Thats fucking hilarious. |
|||
Jan 31st, 2006 04:46 PM | ||||
Pharaoh | I've just seen the picture. | |||
Jan 31st, 2006 07:10 AM | ||||
glowbelly | yeah, kk(k)! don't sweat it! you might not be the brightest bulb in the box, but at least you don't have boobies! :D | |||
Jan 30th, 2006 10:48 PM | ||||
VinceZeb |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 25th, 2006 10:24 AM | ||||
Geggy |
Welcome to the new age fags when it is possible for hackers to break into journalists' email system to delete real photographs that they don't want you to see and plant fake, out-of-date photographs like that one photograph of paki boys standing around an unfired missile along with false information in order to make a mockery out of liberal presses. Although while that makes sense to me, I'm just letting my imagination run wiiiiild, baby. |
|||
Jan 25th, 2006 10:02 AM | ||||
ziggytrix |
or even the children in that picture. but they probably didn't speak french. |
|||
Jan 25th, 2006 06:44 AM | ||||
Pub Lover |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 25th, 2006 06:33 AM | ||||
Kulturkampf |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 24th, 2006 02:06 PM | ||||
Dr. Boogie |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 24th, 2006 07:53 AM | ||||
imported_I, fuzzbot. |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 24th, 2006 07:49 AM | ||||
Pharaoh |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 24th, 2006 04:04 AM | ||||
Kulturkampf | It is a bad caption, and it is a real photo of some old geezer standing next to an artillery round which is being calld a missile, which in the context of any conversation of modern technology does not equal an artillery shell. | |||
Jan 23rd, 2006 05:53 PM | ||||
Jaeger S Meistersen |
I'm feeling egotistical...maybe seeing Kulturekampf start a thread about the definition of his own name struck a chord within me...who knows. So I just want to point out that nobody, and i mean NOBODY has tried to argue that it's not a missile...i owned that part of the argument. Go me. A baby is a fake photo...a photo of the wrong thing is a fakeD photo. If you're going to speak english, you may want to start by learning to speak english. It's called Nuance, smart guy. NOOOO WANTS! Nuance. Dig that shit. |
|||
Jan 23rd, 2006 04:10 PM | ||||
kahljorn | Who cares if they used a fake photo, anyway. It's not like it had any real effect. If this was, say, a fake picture of george bush giving a rhinoceros a blowjob then I'd agree that they stepped too far. But a mistake like using the wrong picture of debris? Come on. Most pointless thing to complain about. | |||
Jan 23rd, 2006 04:03 PM | ||||
Pharaoh |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 23rd, 2006 03:34 PM | ||||
mburbank |
KittyKat came back after he said he was done with the thread which means he's a liar. And if you all argue any longer about Punk (even though I started it) you'll turn it into jazz. I was never punk. BUT I was an adult when it happened. PAST TENSE! Pick a new fucking name, the one your using already got used. Their is no continous revolution. Start your own fucking revolution. OH! YOU CAN'T! Because you haven't got the brains to start anything new so you co-opt something old. And Conservative punks are Log Cabin Republicans without the dignity to hate themselves. |
|||
Jan 23rd, 2006 03:30 PM | ||||
Dr. Boogie | So if you take a picture of baby bin Laden and say that it's a tank, that's a fake picture? | |||
Jan 23rd, 2006 03:22 PM | ||||
Pharaoh |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 23rd, 2006 03:17 PM | ||||
Pharaoh |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 23rd, 2006 02:27 PM | ||||
Cosmo Electrolux |
Quote:
|
|||
Jan 23rd, 2006 02:16 PM | ||||
Spectre X | If I take a photo of a baby and tell people it's a photo of a tank, does that make the photo a fake photo? | |||
Jan 22nd, 2006 05:34 PM | ||||
Kulturkampf |
It is a fake photograph, adveritisng it as an unexploded part of the missile that hit the target when it is a completely in-tact artillery shell. I guess on very abstract levels you would be right, but let's not pretend that it is considered as such consistently -- it is splitting hairs and defending absolutely shit journalism. |
|||
Jan 22nd, 2006 04:36 PM | ||||
Pharaoh |
Quote:
And I believe the French agency who sold the photo knew it wasn't really of the US bombing, but presented it as such, and therefore the NYT bought a fake. Although I accept the NYT may have been innocent, they printed a fake photo. I just don't see how the French agency could have innocently made such a mistake. |
|||
Jan 22nd, 2006 04:16 PM | ||||
ziggytrix |
On the whole "fake" thing, the real crux is did the NYT writers and editors make a mistake or perpetrate a fraud. To use your Rolex analogy, if someone paid $600 for a watch for your Christmas present, and then after you unwrap it, your friend discovers that he was decieved about the item's authenticity, do you then get mad at your friend for buying you a fake Rolex? |
|||
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |