|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Apr 30th, 2006 08:41 AM | |
| Blasted Child |
I think Dan Brown did a good job over all, spreading the word to the masses about the concept of a church built on false beliefs and misinterpretations, and moreover giving some credit to the women in the bible. Anything that can help loosen up the very strict and conservative view on the bible as an absolute truth is good in my humble opinion. It's not, however, very good literature, nor is it an original idea. I recommend Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco, which is far superior literature, and still not at all claming to present any original ideas. |
| Apr 30th, 2006 06:28 AM | |
| the_dudefather |
any big selling book/movie tends to get a few people crawling out of the woodwork with a claim on the original idea (once its at the height of its popularity of course) , wasnt there a similar case with harry potter a few years back? anyway, even if they lose in the court, their books tend to skyrocket in the sales |
| Apr 27th, 2006 03:12 PM | |
| kahljorn | So he even gave him /advertisement/credit/ sourced him. That's madness, sounds like a case of jealousy. |
| Apr 27th, 2006 02:08 PM | |
| El Blanco | Not to mention Brown refers to that book by name more than once in the Davinci Code. |
| Apr 27th, 2006 02:02 PM | |
| kahljorn |
lol Despite how much I despise Dan Brown, I like how someone tried to charge him with plaugerism. MY WORK IS THE ORIGINAL. Ideas like this has been around for so long it's a mystery why that jerkoff thought he had rights over it. That's like trying to put a copyright on the bible or something. Exactly what is he claiming was plaugerized? |
| Apr 27th, 2006 11:09 AM | |
| ziggytrix |
The Smith Code Latest Da Vinci mystery: judge's own secret code Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 PM BST166 By Peter Graff LONDON (Reuters) - Three weeks after a court passed judgement in the copyright case involving Dan Brown's bestseller "The Da Vinci Code", a lawyer has uncovered what may be a secret message buried in the text of the ruling. Lawyer Dan Tench noticed some letters in the judgement had been italicised, and it suddenly dawned on him that they spelled a phrase that included the name of the judge: "Smith code". Justice Peter Smith, who during the trial displayed a sense of humour unusual in the rarefied world of bewigged barristers and ancient tradition, appears to have embraced the mysterious world of codes and conspiracy that run through the novel. "I thought it was a mistake, that there were some stray letters that had been italicised because the word processer had gone wrong," Tench told Reuters. Tench initially told The Times that apparently random letters in the judge's ruling appeared in italics. Wouldn't it be clever if the judge had embedded a secret message in the text? The Times ran a jokey item. "And then I got an e-mail from the judge," said Tench. He said Smith told him to look back at the first paragraphs. The italicised letters scattered throughout the judgement spell out: "smithcodeJaeiextostpsacgreamqwfkadpmqz". Those in the first paragraphs spell out "smith code". But what does the rest mean? The novel, and upcoming movie starring Tom Hanks, are about a secret code that reveals ancient mysteries about Jesus Christ. Smith, who ruled that author Brown had not plagiarised his hugely popular thriller from another book, "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail", has so far not given any clues to his own mystery code. For now, the judge is not speaking. His clerk said he is refusing interviews. She would not confirm whether there truly was a secret mystery embedded in his judgement. But she did confirm that he is, generally speaking, a humorous type of person. |
