|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
Oct 14th, 2003 07:17 PM | ||||
KellyGayos | no | |||
Oct 14th, 2003 03:46 PM | ||||
kellychaos | Strive to support athletics | |||
Oct 14th, 2003 11:30 AM | ||||
mburbank | i support hose | |||
Oct 14th, 2003 11:28 AM | ||||
Zhukov | No, you're the loony idealist. | |||
Oct 14th, 2003 05:40 AM | ||||
FS | No, they were named after Charles Dickens. | |||
Oct 14th, 2003 03:44 AM | ||||
The_Rorschach | No, they were named after a Tahitian whore | |||
Oct 14th, 2003 12:12 AM | ||||
El Blanco | No, they were named after a Mongolian gameshow host. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 11:56 PM | ||||
Big Papa Goat | No, they were named after the Soviet foreign minister. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 11:52 PM | ||||
Jeanette X | Moltovs were named after a Jewish kid in WWII who used them in an uprising against the Nazis in his ghetto. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 11:38 PM | ||||
Protoclown | YOU'RE ALL IN MY HEAD | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 08:44 PM | ||||
kahljorn |
You mean "Anarchy as utopia", per se? As in, if the World could turn within government and laws, it would be because the World was in perfect harmony? I've never read Bakunin, but I understand the idea of Utopia through Anarchy. It's kind of ironic :O I love Molitov's. |
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 06:23 PM | ||||
Helm | ....or if you read Bakunin then it becomes an actual sociopolitical viewpoint and you don't even have to throw one molotv coctail. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 04:09 PM | ||||
kahljorn |
I started this thread in memory of all the 14 year old anarchists. Long live their schooling days. Anarchy can also be a state of mind, a philosophy, almost. |
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 03:56 PM | ||||
incurable paranoiac |
Quote:
priceless. |
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 03:42 PM | ||||
Anti-Xocial |
I don't think is necissary that a dictionary definition of anarchy be presented, but I do find it interesting that so many people support it. Personally, I don't think that a system can really be based on anarchy in the long run. Anarch is temporary...throughout time and ages, man has needed to establish some form of order in whatever kind of surrounding chaos. "Lord Of The Flies" gives you a good look into that world. It would be dillusional to think that anything can be established if based on anarchy, rather than to think that anarchy can "shake things up" a bit and then we resume life in a different order or pattern once again...and hopefully for the better. Come to think of it: ANARCHY .....NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 03:29 PM | ||||
El Blanco |
Quote:
|
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 03:23 PM | ||||
Perndog |
Quote:
|
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 02:56 PM | ||||
Abcdxxxx | I'd support Calvinism but I'm scared of another Beat Happening box set. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 02:43 PM | ||||
El Blanco |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 02:22 PM | ||||
Anonymous | I'm all for Noah's-archy. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 02:12 PM | ||||
Helm |
Quote:
In that sense, your aristocracy, if applied (until it is replaced by the next thing) would provide more important political memory to the whole of humanity. As to your suggestion that history moves in circles, I adhere to the Marxist (boo! shame!) refinement of this idea, that history moves in a spiral. The direction of this spiral, if any is debatable, but this spiral geometrically narrowing in diameter I believe to be fact. Thinking in this way, humanity IS growing, working towards a something, even if the majority of men fail to acknowledge this, because they dissagree with it or because they're not equipped to make such judgement all-together. Two steps forward, one step back as it were. As to a more long-term solution in forms of goverment, I believe a form of libertarian (not nec. in the way you americans use the term, the more traditional concept of maximum freedom) anarchocommunism would eventually be applied when the balance of geopolitical power is no longer a pressing issue (by means of stellar expansion, most possibly), and the nature of man as an instinctual beast has been adequately leashed. Obviously, such a system of goverment would rely much on self-control and moderation, but I believe those qualities to be universally attainable given the proper education, genetic conditioning and gradual readjustment of the collective unconscious. Edit: Oh and to say that Plato is an idiot is to brand yourself as someone who hasn't read his collected works. I might dissagree with 90% of what was attributed to him, but I believe words such as 'idiot' should be used in describing people such as Vincezeb, and not one of the most influental philosophers of all time. |
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 01:36 PM | ||||
Zhukov |
Quote:
And I'd like to hear why people can't all jus' get along. |
|||
Oct 13th, 2003 01:33 PM | ||||
Perndog | Anarchy will always be a pipe dream. People need society and society needs rules. There is no other way to reconcile human diversity and make people get along. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 01:31 PM | ||||
Zhukov | I SUPPORT ANARCHISTS. To an extent. | |||
Oct 13th, 2003 01:01 PM | ||||
ranxer |
i thought you just supported fascism for no reason blanco.. when did you become in charge? i think anarchy could work AFTER we have peace on earth and an embracing of earth as one co-existing family.. which is probably hundreds of generations off if we survive corporate enslavement. |
|||
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |