|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Nov 2nd, 2003 05:28 PM | |
| fishmonger | Well, as far as I know, she couldn't really have had any influence on the trial anyway; she was locked in a freakin' tower, for chrissakes! |
| Oct 31st, 2003 10:25 PM | |
| ranxer |
after reading this discussion i'm  , i wish i could help you with this :/ |
| Oct 30th, 2003 05:52 PM | |
| fishmonger | But I don't think it mattered if she did put out to the deputies of the Estates General; King Louis was executed. |
| Oct 30th, 2003 05:51 PM | |
| fishmonger | Because...uhhh...well, maybe I am on to something with that. |
| Oct 30th, 2003 01:35 AM | |
| kahljorn | Why not? |
| Oct 29th, 2003 09:22 PM | |
| fishmonger | That's what I thought at first, but new research indicates that the Queen had an exceptionally narrow vagina, making sex painful. She may have been a big flirt, but she really wasn't a whore. But then, who knows? Maybe Antoinette gave great head. Of course, that's not going into my paper. |
| Oct 29th, 2003 08:59 PM | |
| fishmonger | Oh. Thanks. |
| Oct 29th, 2003 08:58 PM | |
| kahljorn | She put out to the judge. |
| Oct 29th, 2003 08:56 PM | |
| fishmonger |
Marie Antoinette. Fun! Can't believe I'm asking for homework help on the i-mockery forums. This is a new low in lows. Anywho, I need info on Marie Antoinette's involvement in her husband's trial. Yeah. This is a lost cause. God, I'm so fucked on this one. |
