|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Dec 13th, 2003 05:26 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba |
 Edit: clarifying my lol, I think its funny that you think I'd confuse Andrew WK with emo. |
|
| Dec 12th, 2003 12:36 AM | ||
| Royal Tenenbaum |
Thats not Emo thats Andrew WK!  Emo is more "She is great, but she dumped me; actually I just stalked her, but her hair trimmings smelt nice." |
|
| Dec 11th, 2003 04:32 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba |
HER FRIEND TOLD ME ABOUT THAT SONG.  :/ |
|
| Dec 10th, 2003 11:10 PM | ||
| Schimid |
THE GIRL IS BEAUTIFUL SHE IS BEAUTIFUL
|
|
| Dec 10th, 2003 07:49 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba |
I CHANGED MY MIND. I'M JUST GOING TO LISTEN TO EMO MUSIC AND CRY INSTEAD. :/ |
|
| Dec 9th, 2003 02:21 PM | ||
| Helm |
INCEST
|
|
| Dec 9th, 2003 06:48 AM | ||
| Slinky Ferret | Also my little situation can kinda throw a spanner in. Before that night I only regarded him as a friend. :/ | |
| Dec 8th, 2003 10:41 PM | ||
| FartinMowler |
Quote:
|
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 06:46 PM | ||
| O71394658 |
WHOOPS.  
|
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 06:42 PM | ||
| AChimp |
BECAUSE IT'S GROSS. 
|
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 06:39 PM | ||
| O71394658 |
Quote:
|
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 06:16 PM | ||
| AChimp | http://www.intellectualwhores.com/masterladder.html | |
| Dec 8th, 2003 05:57 PM | ||
| Slinky Ferret | So what is the ladder theory then? | |
| Dec 8th, 2003 05:03 PM | ||
| AChimp |
INCEST. Disproves Ladder Theory right there. :D |
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 04:59 PM | ||
| Perndog | I think the ladder theory is a justification for the guys who just don't know how to get what they want. They feel better about themselves if they can chalk it up to psychology instead of their own ineptitude. | |
| Dec 8th, 2003 04:34 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba |
Yea, I re-read it. :/ It really can't be disproven because its too general and has too many clarifiers. They might as well just say that girls who wont fuck you wont fuck you unless they're drunk. Ladder theory is true, but nothing magical or formula-esque. Basically the harder people try to make something all-encompassing all they do is make that idea less and less applicable to real life. Anyone who continues pining over a girl that obviously has no interest in them is a moron anyway. The ladder theory is the guy version of "personality quizzes". It something you should know about yourself and your relationships with people already. |
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 03:55 PM | ||
| Perndog |
That's the philosophical equivalent of training wheels. Let's tack these things on so no matter how shaky the thing is it can't fall over.
|
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 03:41 PM | ||
| O71394658 |
Quote:
|
|
| Dec 8th, 2003 08:39 AM | ||
| ziggytrix |
romantic sentiments taste better than neurological stimuli 
|
|
| Dec 7th, 2003 08:36 PM | ||
| Helm |
If you want, I can help you. Seeing how it's full of holes as a theory, I mean. From first glance, I can see a number of psychological neuroses or fixations which could lead a man or woman to having intercourse or even a stable relationship with someone not very high on their ladder (passive agressive manifestation, masochistim etc). So psychological and/or even physiological health obviously is an unlisted issue which you could exploit to an unlimited length (by showing how one's chemical state is never normalised so how can a generic mode of psychological normality even be employed so on so forth) but if you're doing this because of some romantic sentiment you may have, then I'm not sure I care to help. |
|
| Dec 7th, 2003 05:07 PM | ||
| The One and Only... |
I remember the ladder theory. Personally, I accept it. Just one more thing I can be the antagonist on. |
|
| Dec 7th, 2003 04:30 PM | ||
| Rongi | GIRLS HAVE VAGINAS STILL, RIGHT? | |
| Dec 7th, 2003 02:55 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba |
I intend to disprove or at least damage the ladder theory I will disprove the ladder theory if it kills me. More info as it comes. |
|
