|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
Oct 18th, 2004 10:21 PM | |||||
Preechr | A question then: Is Bush responsible for the polls that at one time showed that 70% of Americans believed Saddam Hussein had something to do with the planning and/or implementation of the 9/11/1 attacks? | ||||
Oct 17th, 2004 10:24 PM | |||||
kahljorn |
I MISLEAD AMERICA BY PUTTING SENTENCES NEXT TO EACHOTHER! PLEASE INPEACH ME! You know, you used the word 'I' and 'mislead' next to eachother! You must be trying to mislead me! I FIGURED OUT YOUR PLAN. |
||||
Oct 17th, 2004 07:36 PM | |||||
The One and Only... | I understand that he didn't directly state it. However, it's blatantly obvious that's what he wants you to think. If you honestly cannot see how Kerry was trying to mislead America with that comment, then I pity you. | ||||
Oct 17th, 2004 01:04 AM | |||||
kahljorn |
Thats the problem-- I read, and listened People have paragraphs and sentences for a reason-- it's a debate. They say plenty of things all at once, on a related topic, because they have a time frame(Maybe you noticed that when the guy said, "You have ninety seconds). They are related. Would you like the definition of related? It was about gun control, mentioning a SITUATION or EXAMPLE in which a bad guy had an assault weapon is something called intelligent debating. Then later mentioning why it has been allowed to happen... what the fuck man, you need to learn how to read and listen. I feel sorry for you if you can't tell these things apart. You're exactly the kind of sucker they look for in a human being. Like I said, I have this CRAZY ability to listen to people and understand what they are saying, maybe that's why I'm not a halfwit who starts threads like, "KERRY SAID YOU CAN BUY AK47'S", when that's cleary what he didn't say at all. You know how i know? Because he didn't say, "Terrorists buy their ak47's from america!" , now maybe if it had said that you'd have a valid point, but other than that you're just going, "LOOK THE PARAGRAPHS ARE NEXT TO EACHOTHER ITS A CONSPIRACY" "OH GOD LOOK THESE TWO BOOKS ARE NEXT TO EACHOTHER IN THE BOOK STORE ITS A CONSPIRACY". OH SHIT, BUSH AND KERRY STOOD NEXT TO EACHOTHER IN THE DEBATE. WHAT THE FUCK, ITS A GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY! THEY MUST HAVE BEEN TALKING TO EACHOTHER OR SOMETHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! I SHOULD WRITE A FUCKING BOOK AM I RIGHT. |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 07:05 PM | |||||
The One and Only... |
Quote:
It's obvious that Kerry implied that an AK47 is an assault weapon that can now legally be purchased. If he weren't, the comment about the AK47 would have been entirely irrelevant. |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 06:30 PM | |||||
kahljorn |
All you stupid bitches got bitch slapped! You dyslexic fucks! KERRY SAID YOU CAN BUY AKS BOOHOOO. Now it's turned into a debate for gun control, that's an improvement. Sort of the eternal arguement, though, of if it's better to attack your enemies before they attack you-- the chicken or the egg? Guns for everyone or guns for none? |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 01:57 PM | |||||
Zebra 3 |
![]() |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 01:07 PM | |||||
Preechr |
Ummm... My point of comparing the size of the countries was to illustrate that while gun control might be practical on a tiny little island like the UK or even a marginally less tiny island like Japan... Wait... Is this where I'm supposed to be hilarious? Ok ok ok... I get it. ![]() I'm not worried about career criminals plotting to steal my VCR as much as I'm worried about the average lazy idiot that decides it's easier to risk his life stealing stuff than it would be to get a job. I agree with you on your point that ANYONE can own a gun for ANY reason is a bit scary, and even from a libertarian POV I can't read the 2nd Amendment and see where it says right to keep and bear arms and also stockpile them secretly. It's somewhat creepy to know my neighbor might have enough weaponry to arm his own Delta Force and none of the rest of us in the neighborhood has any right to know about that. On the other hand, government databases that pinpoint the locations of every firearm in the country violates the 2nd in that it was written specifically to guard against government swinging authoritarian as well as to afford protection from ciminals when the government isn't doing it's job. [hilarity break] ![]() I don't know the answer and I'm not sure there is one. Violence is too ingrained in humanity to offer any hope of us ever living in a peaceful world. Somehow this got twisted around to be something other than the "Kerry pretty much just flat out lied" discussion I'd intended. I'm not a "gun-nut" so I don't have the proper motivation to offer a good defense. I'm a reluctant gun owner that's bored with this non-argument now. Quote:
But I'll leave it for later. |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 09:43 AM | |||||
MetalMilitia |
Quote:
Sucks to be american. |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 09:03 AM | |||||
Anonymous |
Blanco: I think the fundamental thing you fail to understand is that I personally don't care if you have a gun. Telling people on a case-by-case basis to not have weapons is silly because the availablity is still there. As long as you are able to legally own a gun, go nuts with planters Peanuts. I don't think people SHOULD be legally allowed, but since they are, it certainly may come down to a 'necessary evil' to own one, if for no other reason than increasing your chances of survival by 1%. I don't think it'll do much good, the only reason I'd get one is to shoot at targets on a range or to use as a prop in movies. And again, as long as I have that right, I'm going to go ahead and exercise it, whether or not I think it's a good idea for everyone else to. But through all of this talk about how you're the safest guy in the world to buy a handgun to protect your girlfriend and so on and so forth, you aren't the American I'm worried about. It's the average american, with their average IQ of 100, that concerns me with deadly weapons. Quote:
Quote:
Okay, so, not the constitution. Laws. It's a lot easier for the purposes of a joke to pretend all laws come from a single document, and I'd figured you'd have either picked up on that or seen it as a golden opportunity to be hilarious - Sadly, the outcome was neither. A criminal is no different from a citizen except in the fact that they choose to break the law. This doesn't make them any more dangerous than you. Criminals have rights, too, and while they don't have the right to break into your house and kill your family and dog, they do have the right to a fair trial, which is exactly what they'd get if you popped a cap in them and didn't 'finish the job'. I looked at your link, and will tell you for the third time that it doesn't make sense. For me to believe whatever facts it's going to throw at me, it has to first appeal to my common sense. Otherwise, I have no reason to believe it. Canada is in no way a more violent nation than the United States. To think otherwise is unfathomably ridiculous. Quote:
Quote:
Preechr: Fantastically accurate and thought-provoking image, Preech. Here are some stats you probably already know, being the extremely profound child prodigy you are. Japan Area: 377,576 Sq Km Population: 126,994,100 Annual gun-related murders: 15 UK Area: 244,103 Sq Km Population: 58,991,500 Annual gun-related murders: 30 US Area: 9,372,608 Sq Km Population: 271,290,000 Annual gun-related murders: 9,390 Gun Murders per 100,000 Km (in 1997) Japan: 3.97 UK: 12.29 US: 100.19 Gun Murders per 10 million citizens (in 1997) Japan: 1.18 UK: 5.08 US: 346.12 Is that a little more illuminating? The US is 38 and 1/3rd times larger than the UK, yet has 313 times the amount of gun-related annual deaths. But they are more likely to nick your school lunch card, so really, which is the bigger evil am i right guys. |
||||
Oct 16th, 2004 02:41 AM | |||||
kahljorn | Semi automatic weapons can be converted to and from automatic. | ||||
Oct 16th, 2004 02:23 AM | |||||
Crying Baby Jesus |
Quote:
|
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 08:37 PM | |||||
kahljorn |
"And that's what Osama bin Laden's handbook said, because we captured it in Afghanistan. It encouraged them to do it." Your guess is as good as mine why they do that.. maybe it has something to do with the cost it would take to Smuggle it into the country being about the same as it would cost to just buy guns here? Not all gun shows have background checks, even BUSH SAID THEY DONT DO ENOUGH BACKGROUND CHECKS. |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 07:20 PM | |||||
MetalMilitia |
I cant be assed to read all the quoteing and whatnot ^^ up there but anyway. Wtf i think if terrorists from other countries wanted to buy AKs it would be somewhat easier to get them in places like iraq ect and cheaper too. I mean what kind of terrorist is going to think 'hey if we can get into america we can get false identies, then go to a gun show and undergo a background check then mabey, just mabey we can get a couple of AKs for a shit load of money.' in reality it would proabbyl be more liek 'hey we could pick up a couple of AKs from some russion dude i know in the middle east, he says he'll thow in a free RPG if we buy 10 AKs.' |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 06:28 PM | |||||
kahljorn |
"I did listen. That isn't the full quote. " Oh, Okay, so there's a part missing where he goes, "TERRORISTS BUY AK47's AT GUN SHOWS". DO you mind showing me where this happens? "KERRY: I believe it was a failure of presidential leadership not to reauthorize the assault weapons ban. I am a hunter. I'm a gun owner. I've been a hunter since I was a kid, 12, 13 years old. And I respect the Second Amendment and I will not tamper with the Second Amendment. But I'll tell you this. I'm also a former law enforcement officer. I ran one of the largest district attorney's offices in America, one of the ten largest. I put people behind bars for the rest of their life. I've broken up organized crime. I know something about prosecuting. And most of the law enforcement agencies in America wanted that assault weapons ban. They don't want to go into a drug bust and be facing an AK-47. I was hunting in Iowa last year with a sheriff from one of the counties there, and he pointed to a house in back of us, and said, "See the house over? We just did a drug bust a week earlier, and the guy we arrested had an AK-47 lying on the bed right beside him. " Because of the president's decision today, law enforcement officers will walk into a place that will be more dangerous. Terrorists can now come into America and go to a gun show and, without even a background check, buy an assault weapon today. And that's what Osama bin Laden's handbook said, because we captured it in Afghanistan. It encouraged them to do it. So I believe America's less safe. If Tom DeLay or someone in the House said to me, "Sorry, we don't have the votes," I'd have said, "Then we're going to have a fight. " And I'd have taken it out to the country and I'd have had every law enforcement officer in the country visit those congressmen. We'd have won what Bill Clinton won. " http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2004d.html DAMN, IT MUST BE A LIBERAL CONSPIRACY!!!! |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 06:26 PM | |||||
El Blanco | Not to mention that most of the English coast is too rocky to just come up to with a boat. Thats why there is only one major port city. | ||||
Oct 15th, 2004 06:24 PM | |||||
kahljorn |
"I did listen. That isn't the full quote. " Oh, Okay, so there's a part missing where he goes, "TERRORISTS BUY AK47's AT GUN SHOWS". DO you mind showing me where this happens? |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 05:29 PM | |||||
Preechr |
http://images.google.com/images?q=tb...up/misc/UK.gif![]() and that's not even to scale. STFU |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 05:06 PM | |||||
JPR |
Quote:
|
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 04:20 PM | |||||
The One and Only... |
Quote:
Also, fully automatic weapons can be made pretty easily from any gun, or even from spare parts. |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 04:09 PM | |||||
HNICPantitude | The 17 states and the District of Columbia without concealed-carry permits enjoy an 81 percent higher rate of violent crime. Their restrictive gun laws produced 1,400 more murders, 4,200 more rapes, 12,000 more robberies, and 60,000 more aggravated assaults. | ||||
Oct 15th, 2004 11:55 AM | |||||
Zebra 3 |
Quote:
![]() |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 11:10 AM | |||||
ziggytrix |
Quote:
And that toally is the point. Amendment 2 in the Bill of Rights was written with the intention that our government wouldn't be able to tyrannize us with its military. It was written so that the US could never become a police state. And if you don't like it, you should probably save up and move to a country that has a less paranoid birthright, because as many restrictions as may get passed, firearms will never be banned in the US. Quote:
|
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 10:55 AM | |||||
Preechr |
Quote:
As for your scenario, it's pretty simple the way I see it. If someone breaks into my house in the middle of the night, I can either have a gun to protect myself and my family, or not. To not have one is to place a higher priority on the intruder's life than my own. Living alone now, I can take that risk and give my gun to my cousin. You try to make it sound like anyone that chooses to own a gun is some sort of unhinged idiot. I'm trying to explain to you that responsible gun ownership can be a logical and practical option. If I had kids, I'd factor that into my decision of course. I survived 30 years without the need to play Rambo. I don't fit in the catagory you'd like to place me in. While I know people that do, I'd like you to consider for a moment that many people own guns for other reasons than those you can easily dismiss. Quote:
I see no need to give the criminal an advantage over me. He may have a knife or a boomerang. I want a gun. Quote:
I picked a potatoe gun because it's easily found on the internet and about the simplest weapon to build. The point is that while you and I, as responsible citizens, have to go to work every day and do other responsible stuff, a criminal has nothing better to do but sit around and figure up new and better ways to get what he wants by force. If we somehow successfully collected all guns from the world, a criminal would still find a way to threaten decent people, and I'd still want a gun to protect myself. Quote:
"The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves in all cases to which they think themselves competent (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved), or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of the press." --Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 1824. See? TJ agrees with me that the right to bear arms is just as important as all that other crap. He even calls it a DUTY, and I couldn't agree more. Yes, the times have changed since then and we are no longer a frontier... but criminals are much more common now than Injuns, bears and cougars ever were. Governments have also learned new tactics of fascism and totalitarianism that were unheard of at the time but luckily not unforeseen. I feel like I'm repeating myself, so I'll quit trying to explain this to you. It's obvious that you, FS and kahl didn't look at that link I gave you. You should, unless you want to go on believing all that made up crap about the dangers of an armed citizenry. It's all footnoted and stuff. You'll like it. |
||||
Oct 15th, 2004 05:29 AM | |||||
FS |
Khaka? Quote:
Quote:
I think Chojin makes a very valid point when he questions just how often a gun in civilian hands actually does any good. The only situation I can imagine is when you hear someone trudging through your house at night and you can get to the living room silently enough to get the drop on him. And still the outcome would be difficult to predict. Not being born in a country where it's a constitutional right to own a gun, it's as alien to me as a native greeting where you both put your fingers in your ears and bash your foreheads together. But when I hear gun discussions going on, the pro side sooner or later starts sounding like insane, paranoid hermits living in a shack in the woods away from civilization, that's plotting to kill them. Like you all sleep with one eye open and a hand on the gun beneath your pillow, ready to jump out and spray the room with bullets at the first unlucky burglar that tries to breach your kingdom. Not to mention the kind of paranoia when you say you don't trust only the government with the right to bear arms. What, they're going to declare national martial law and enslave everyone to the salt mines of Xyr the moment everyone's forced to turn in their glocks? |
||||
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |