|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Sep 4th, 2006 01:36 PM | ||
| Juttin |
Ignorant as in, " Don't understand what is going on in the political stance, but just re-vote for someone because they invaded an unrelated country to their precious 9/11 White-Trash Whiny Bullshit Although, it doesn't matter, because they're all Towel-Head Terrorists, AMIRITE?" |
|
| Sep 4th, 2006 01:28 PM | ||
| The Good Reverend Roger |
Quote:
|
|
| Sep 4th, 2006 05:30 AM | ||
| Juttin |
I was saying... " Democracy is good, if you don't let ignorant people vote" |
|
| Sep 4th, 2006 03:39 AM | ||
| The Good Reverend Roger |
Quote:
Alexander Hamilton would have approved, though. |
|
| Sep 3rd, 2006 09:26 PM | ||
| Chojin | Thank god. | |
| Sep 3rd, 2006 06:29 PM | ||
| Grislygus | I can't begin to describe how much I disagree with that... | |
| Sep 3rd, 2006 02:12 AM | ||
| kahljorn |
I don't know, but I was wondering the same thing  We pay money to soldiers families if they die I think. Not too much of a difference. |
|
| Sep 3rd, 2006 02:02 AM | ||
| Juttin |
I could see that. They even have pets, like a fish, dog and cat, all with C4 strapped to them 
|
|
| Sep 2nd, 2006 11:38 PM | ||
| Zhukov | Are we talking the families ofterrorists, or entire families of terrorists? | |
| Sep 2nd, 2006 06:37 PM | ||
| kahljorn |
"You don't think the survivors use the money on further terrorism?" No, certainly not all of them. I'm sure they already have plenty of money for terrorist Families don't send terrorists somewhere, terrorists send terrorists places. the rest is a kind of good point. |
|
| Sep 2nd, 2006 02:00 PM | ||
| Courage the Cowardly Dog |
Quote:
How the hell could this money be considered anything but encouraging it? You don't think the survivors use the money on further terrorism? It goes to TERRORIST FAMILIES, not "innocent people who had no idea the person would do this" but people who sent the person there to do it. |
|
| Sep 2nd, 2006 12:31 AM | ||
| kahljorn |
I don't know terrorists have probably kind of proved themselves capable of commiting an extreme amount of damage with a small amount of expense. MONEY TO FAMILIES isn't going to fund the terrorists. Want to know who it's TO: FAMILIES. |
|
| Sep 1st, 2006 05:35 PM | ||
| Zhukov | Christ. | |
| Sep 1st, 2006 05:22 PM | ||
| Courage the Cowardly Dog |
I hate the south too but you can't say Saddam didn't support terrorism just cause he didn't support ONE plot. How many other terrorist actions DID he support. What's this? It's $10,000 check to the family of a dead terrorist to thank them for their sacrifice in the holy war. He wrote a LOT of these. If we didn't stop Saddam he'd support another attack and eventually one would be successful on american soil. But americans arent the only lives that matter how about  1,000,000 Iraqi corpses of people he had killed cause their race had a few people who didn't like his nazi ass policies. Do you only give a flying shit if your next? Whata bout the people right next to him he had killed? Or the checks for people a few countries over? You know next he may wanted to go for white people, would you care then? 2,000+ deaths were to save countless thousand more. It amy be a rough war, it may be harsh and even futile (maybe) but if there is any chance of saving more lives how can we say no? |
|
| Sep 1st, 2006 01:39 PM | ||
| DuFresne | You can lock it you want. I just wanted to fuck with juttin for a while. :/ commie bastard. | |
| Sep 1st, 2006 01:12 PM | ||
| kahljorn |
"Why should citizens care? Why can't the masses be asses?" I don't know what this is directed at but I have two things to say: Citizens should care and not be asses because they are citizens/participants of a socio-political structure that allows them to thrive in such large numbers, and was the foundation of such a population, and if they don't want a social structure they should live in the forest or on a farm Which brings me to my second point, if you lived in the forest or on a farm a mass of asses would be very useful for maintaining a small communal functioning. |
|
| Aug 31st, 2006 08:54 PM | ||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Explain what the hell the topic is, and maybe we won't need to lock it up. Are we discussing communism? Capitalism? Here's a question on the theme presented earlier-- Why should citizens care? Why can't the masses be asses? |
|
| Aug 31st, 2006 07:14 PM | ||
| DuFresne | Yeah, I was on the fence as to where to put it. I figured since it is a philosophical argument, and not a fag-fat-fag-fat argument, it should be here. | |
| Aug 31st, 2006 07:11 PM | ||
| Fathom Zero |
Well I'll be last if they do. Or they could just move it to the Mock Wars, where it should be when you think about it. |
|
| Aug 31st, 2006 07:08 PM | ||
| Juttin | Well, Chojin, or Kevin, can lock this whenever they want. | |
| Aug 31st, 2006 07:06 PM | ||
| FartinMowler | this thread officially sucks...I'm never going to be a moderator, but this smells like dog shit on a rotting prostitute :/ | |
| Aug 31st, 2006 06:40 PM | ||
| Juttin |
Fine, I'll check to see what the " Present" is, then I'll declare peace. Unless it's a cruise missle, in which case I'll continue causing your anarchy 
|
|
| Aug 31st, 2006 06:39 PM | ||
| Archduke Tips |
I think the inherent flaw with government is that a few people always end up leading the masses. The only logical solution is for a greater being to rule us all. I suggest either God or a really big computer that plays chess. |
|
| Aug 31st, 2006 06:36 PM | ||
| Fathom Zero | ON THE CONTRARY. I sent you a present. | |
| Aug 31st, 2006 06:30 PM | ||
| Juttin | I didn't even think you played that stupid game anymore | |
| This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | ||
