|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
Jun 13th, 2007 05:33 PM | |||||||||
MockMeAmadeus | Wells, you only have to know the QWERT. Any feminine hygiene product can roll around THAT! | ||||||||
Jun 13th, 2007 05:23 PM | |||||||||
kahljorn |
I have a document, here, right here, from a certain unnamed source who works for some important place that knows a lot of stuff, that says geggy is a douchebag. Can you guys imagine that? All this time I thought geggy was a human, and he's actually a feminine hygiene product. How did you learn to type without hands? Do you just like throw the liquid inside you around so you roll around like a waterballoon? |
||||||||
Jun 13th, 2007 08:42 AM | |||||||||
MockMeAmadeus | One should not mess with Israel. They have God (and Shin Beit) on their side. Seriously though, an unnamed contact at the Euro-Arab parliamentary association (?). I have it on GOOD authority that Paris Hilton will stop all her shenanigans when she gets out of jail. S’true! My source is an unnamed contact at the Hilton hotel group. You better believe it boyo! | ||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 03:49 PM | |||||||||
KevinTheOmnivore | Blanco, that post alone speaks high volume of cognitive dissonance. | ||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 02:54 PM | |||||||||
El Blanco |
Quote:
They never blamed Egypt for the shooting. They admitted to it right away and flew the Naval attache from Tel Aviv to the boat when they figured out what had happened. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 02:36 PM | |||||||||
El Blanco |
The guardian is not the measuring stick of the mainstream British media. that would be the BBC, who has one lonely little article on it. All over it my ass. Why should the US media care about an unsubstantiated accusation brought to light in the worst rag the UK has to offer? |
||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 09:18 AM | |||||||||
Geggy |
I'm supposed to be laughing at you, not the other way around I know you've failed to acknowledge the possible reasons and motives listed in the article for shin beit to collude with the palestinian terrorists that brings a different light to a compelling case and contradicts the original explanation of idi admin's involvement as it is widely believed in israel. One thing I don't undrstand why the british corp. media is all over the story but not the US media. It would be nice to get some clarification as to why israel was mentioned in the document. |
||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 08:09 AM | |||||||||
KevinTheOmnivore | Kahl, that post alone speaks high volume of cognitive dissonance. | ||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 07:28 AM | |||||||||
kahljorn |
lol maybe this is a subtle hilarity on my part but: http://ussliberty.org/report/exhibit%25204-26.pdf notice how SECRET is crossed off at the bottom that made me laugh for some reason. |
||||||||
Jun 5th, 2007 07:03 AM | |||||||||
Geggy |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
Jun 4th, 2007 06:23 PM | |||||||||
El Blanco |
Geggy, how was the USS Liberty being accidentally shot a black op? And do you have to take a hit from an 8ball to come up with some of this shit? |
||||||||
Jun 4th, 2007 03:35 PM | |||||||||
Grislygus | I CAN'T READ YOUR CRAZY MOON LANGUAGE | ||||||||
Jun 4th, 2007 11:54 AM | |||||||||
KevinTheOmnivore |
How could you possibly know all of these things, considering you never read any of the stuff you post here? Could you answer Blanco's question? |
||||||||
Jun 4th, 2007 07:07 AM | |||||||||
Geggy | I see the ADL are continuing to shine the 1 million watts flashlight into your eyes and tapping on your head as if you were a bobblehead with a mechanical voice that shouts "anti semite!" to prevent you from even considering the possibility of israel's involvement of the hijacking, which wouldn't be surprising since they have long history of black ops involvement such as the lavon affair and attack of the uss liberty, among others, in attempt to shift blame on their enemies. | ||||||||
Jun 3rd, 2007 08:41 PM | |||||||||
Big Papa Goat | I dunno if the thing they're describing is really a 'document', it's not like it was a Mossad memo or anything, it seems to be basically the speculations of some French embassy guy that the Israeli secret service helped plan this. | ||||||||
Jun 3rd, 2007 06:16 PM | |||||||||
Girl Drink Drunk | Dale Gribble | ||||||||
Jun 3rd, 2007 03:38 PM | |||||||||
El Blanco |
Geggy, did you read the article? Once again, its not claiming what your title says it does. It mentions in passing the connection to the Israeli secret service, but doesn't offer any proof of that. It does more to implicate Idi Amin. |
||||||||
Jun 2nd, 2007 06:21 PM | |||||||||
Ant10708 | No one was alive when ti happened because it didn't happen | ||||||||
Jun 2nd, 2007 03:23 PM | |||||||||
Emu | JEWSJEWSJEWS | ||||||||
Jun 2nd, 2007 06:14 AM | |||||||||
kahljorn | Whatever kevin you dont KNOW that the holocaust happened were you ALIVE when it happened? No. | ||||||||
Jun 2nd, 2007 05:15 AM | |||||||||
KevinTheOmnivore |
citing an unnamed contact at the Euro-Arab parliamentary association That seals it! I'm pulling for this becoming another "Geggy has his doubts about the Holocaust" thread. |
||||||||
Jun 1st, 2007 07:44 PM | |||||||||
Geggy |
Document shows Israel had a hand in 1976 hijacking Documents claim Israel aided Entebbe hijack Mark Tran Friday June 1, 2007 Guardian Unlimited The Israeli secret service and radical Palestinians may have engineered the hijacking of an Air France plane that flew to Entebbe in Uganda, according to a claim in newly released government documents. This extraordinary interpretation on the Entebbe raid was cited by a British diplomat, DH Colvin of the Paris embassy, in June 30 1976 as the world was transfixed by the hostage crisis in Entebbe, which features in the recent film The Last King of Scotland. In a document released by the National Archives , Mr Colvin, citing an unnamed contact at the Euro-Arab parliamentary association, wrote: "According to his information, the hijack was the work of the PFLP [Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine], with help from the Israeli secret service, the Shin Beit." Describing the collaboration as an unholy alliance, he went on: "The operation was designed to torpedo the PLO's [Palestine Liberation Organisation] standing in France and to prevent what they see as a growing rapprochement between the PLO and the Americans. "Their nightmare is that after the November elections, one will witness the imposition in the Middle East of a Pax Americana, which will be the advantage of the PLO (who will gain international respectability and perhaps the right to establish a state on evacuated territories) and to the disadvantage of the Refusal Front (who will be squeezed right out in any overall peace settlement and will lose their raison d'etre) and Israel (who will be forced to evacuate occupied territory)." Hijackers seized the plane shortly after it took off from Athens on June 27. The plane was diverted first to Benghazi, Libya, where it was refuelled before to going on to Entebbe. In Entebbe, the hijackers released most of the hostages but kept 98 people, many of them Israeli citizens, and threatened to kill them unless Israel met their demands. In the dramatic rescue, Israeli commandos flew 2,500 miles, receiving cooperation from neighbouring Kenya to mount their assault on the night of July 3. They fought a 36-minute battle at the airport with the seven hijackers and about 80 Ugandan soldiers. The six hijackers were killed, along with 45 Ugandan soldiers, three hostages and a sole member of the Israeli rescue party. Colonel Jonathan Netanyahu, the elder brother of Benjamin Netanyahu, who subsequently became prime minister, was killed after being shot from the airport tower. Although the Ugandan president, Idi Amin, frequently visited the hostages and tried to encourage them, it is generally believed, particularly by Israel - as the documents show - that he collaborated with the hijackers. The hijackers' demands included a list of countries that should release Palestinians or others fighting for the Palestinian cause. The document said France was being sent the message that a pro-Palestinian policy was "no guarantee" it would not be targeted by Palestinian terrorists. Particularly if it ends in bloodshed, "the incident will have damaged the Palestinian cause with French public opinion", the document noted. The diplomat drew several lessons from the incident, including the need for international collaboration to counter international terrorism and the blow that had been dealt to the theory that a western country could in any sense be a terrorist-free sanctuary. As for the policy implications of the Entebbe saga, he concluded: "If the incident does lead to a reappraisal of French Middle East policy (which seems unlikely), it is likely to lend weight to the arguments of those who call for an early resumption of moves leading to an overall peace settlement, including the creation of a Palestinian state on territory to be evacuated by Israel. "Unless this is done, the indiscipline of the Palestinians will become more marked and incidents of this kind will become more frequent." |