|FAQ||Members List||Calendar||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read|
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|Nov 27th, 2009 04:40 PM|
|wetstereorebel||Have Igone crazy or did I just see an ad for DIANETICS on this page?|
|Nov 26th, 2009 08:02 PM|
|Kilgore Cod||The first American Psycho has to be one of the absolute worst movies I've ever seen. I can't believe there are people who liked that pile of shit.|
|Nov 22nd, 2009 10:28 AM|
|Zbu Manowar||I think I stuck with the movie for five minutes, and then stopped when it was revealed that Meg from Family Guy just happened to kill Patrick Bateman. As fucking if. As fucking if.|
|Nov 20th, 2009 11:45 AM|
|zeezeeramone||I'm sorry but American Psycho wasn't a great film. If you read the book, you'd see that they left soooooo much out. I mean the violence is so over the top and gory if they made a true adaptation it would be NC-17 for sure. As for the sequal, why do they make that crap? I heard about the Donnie Darko sequal too and have probably the same amount of enthusiasm for it, 0%.|
|Nov 19th, 2009 03:07 PM|
|Nick||I have to agree about the poster. It's horrible.|
|Nov 19th, 2009 02:06 PM|
|goblyn||I haven't seen this or the original (I don't know why, the original doesn't interest me at all and I'm a huge horror fan), but I love Mila Kunis. I wonder, if it wasn't trying to tie into the original, and therefore get compared to the original, would it still be as terrible of a movie? Or would it be, as I get the impression it may, a pretty campy, entertaining movie?|
|Nov 18th, 2009 04:37 PM|
Wasn't the whole idea of the "Psycho" part in the first film was that he was hallucinating all of his killings in the first place and that was the reason that at the end they talk about the guy he killed in the beginning was in Europe and alive? He was Psycho cause his middle schizophrenic hallucinations made him think he actually killed those people, and try to feed a cat to an ATM... At least that was what I got from it at least (haven't read the book so it might be more detailed in that as being real)
And if that is the case how can she have survived an attack that never happened?
|Nov 18th, 2009 04:00 PM|
|caffman||I hated the original because I loved the book!|
|Nov 18th, 2009 08:01 AM|
|saturnknight||Isn't Mila Kunis also the girl who does the voice of Meg on Family guy?|
|Nov 18th, 2009 05:12 AM|
|EchoCharlie||Reminds me of the sequels to Highlander. Stinky much?|
|Nov 17th, 2009 12:26 AM|
|All Hail Duke||travel back in time to stop yourself from seeing this,this was bad,uwe boll bad|
|Nov 16th, 2009 08:56 PM|
William Shatner in a bad movie? Surely you jest!
I love the original, but I never intend to see this one. Thanks you for confirming that my decision is a good one.
|Nov 16th, 2009 07:23 PM|
|dewman||Only scene I remember from this movie was Bill Shatner falling out of a window for no reason.|
|Nov 16th, 2009 07:00 PM|
|DougClayton4231||The only scene from this movie that I remember was the kill with the condom. Her line "Ribbed, for her pleasure" doesn't help things either. I can't believe that that line has ingrained itself into my neurons.|
|Nov 16th, 2009 05:51 PM|
Yeah, this one looked pretty bad. And while I normally have no problems with films that are sequels in name only (sure, I can't think of any examples right now, but I'm sure there's some good ones out there), I'll be passing this one up.
Though at least someone's gotta like it, since over on TVtropes it has a fairly positive mention.
|Nov 16th, 2009 04:57 PM|
|Dr. Boogie||By the way, the guy who directed it was not the same guy who narrated March of the Penguins.|
|Nov 16th, 2009 04:29 PM|
Weekly Movie Review: American Psycho 2
Automatically generated comment thread for Weekly Movie Review: American Psycho 2.