|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
Jun 17th, 2003 12:40 AM | ||
Burned In Effigy | Only poor people and minorities shop at stores like wal-mart anyways, so who cares. | |
Jun 17th, 2003 12:39 AM | ||
CastroMotorOil | I work at Meijer and it is 100000 times better then Wal-mart | |
Jun 16th, 2003 04:33 PM | ||
Immortal Goat | PHONY! | |
Jun 16th, 2003 04:32 PM | ||
Immortal Goat | Yeah, right, HickMan. Don't believe him, he's always saying that Wal-Mart is the best store ever, and that I am stupid for hating it. PHONY!! PHONY PHONY PHONY!!! | |
Jun 16th, 2003 04:27 PM | ||
HickMan |
I'm not that big for Wal-Mart either, but I go there in habbit. I fear that they will take over the world some day. They definetly have enough power and money to do so. But I go there and I will keep on going there regardless of this post. I don't want to it's just they have dvds for cheap. ![]() |
|
Jun 16th, 2003 02:27 PM | ||
Vibecrewangel |
EVIL Kelly that made me lol.... Here is one more reason.... BIG BROTHER COMES TO WAL-MART By Mary Starrett June 11, 2003 NewsWithViews.com Starting this week, the nation's largest discount retailer will quietly begin selling tracking-chipped products to clueless shoppers. The first volley in their war against our privacy is set to start at their Brockton, Massachusetts store. Wal-Mart will put Radio Frequency I.D. sensors on shelves stocked with RFID-tagged Gillette products, but they'd rather you didn't know about it, because, hey, you might not like it, and then you might make noise and then they'd have a big PR mess on their hands. You might even stop buying Gillette products or, say, refuse to shop at Wal-Mart. These chips, researched at M.I.T.'s Auto-ID Center are about the size of a grain of sand. Chipsters say the technology will only be used to help retailers keep track of inventory - like bar codes. But privacy-loving consumers question the very concept of a device that sends out radio waves to "readers" that not only identify the article, but where and with whom it's going. The Big Brother implications of this thing need little hyping to get your skin crawling. Wal-Mart's putting the pressure on its top 100 suppliers to make sure their inventory is all chipped by the end of next year. But why start this in Brockton, Mass? Could it be because the store's customers are typically lower income minorities who'd be less likely to be aware of the tracking devices, and even less likely to make a fuss about them? Their thinking? Let's foist it on folks who're too concerned about paying the electric bill to be aware of these types of issues. Retailers are SUPPOSED to alert their customers to the tracking chips and offer to "kill" the tags at the checkout counter. Don't count on it, because what you don't know won't hurt you, right? And to PROVE those RFID tags won't be "killed" at the cash register one of the ways they're planning on convincing you, the shopper that these tags are A-OK is by touting how "hassle-free" returns will be. Huh? If the tags are supposedly turned off at purchase, how can they be read after the item's brought back to the store? Just one of the myriad lies you'll be told about this technology. Are we to expect that in addition to being asked the "paper or plastic" question we'll get an option on whether the RFID tags are left on or turned off? Not only will consumers be witnessing the death throes of privacy, but it's going to cost them. Currently, the chips cost about 60 cents each. Add that to the cost of each and every item that uses this Orwellian technology. Gillette and Wal-Mart are only the pioneers here, the stated plan is to affix each item produced on the planet with RFID tags. Each pack of gum, each roll of film, each bottle of Merlot. So what's a freedom-loving shopper to do? Fortunately for us, there's a really smart lady finishing up a Ph.D. at Harvard. She started a group that's bellowing out the urgency of fighting this technology; her name is Katherine Albrecht and she's founder of CASPIAN (Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion And Numbering). Albrecht's CASPIAN has proposed a piece of federal legislation called "RFID RIGHT TO KNOW ACT OF 2003". It's a law that would let consumers know which products had tracking chips attached to them. In short, the proposed bill would amend the Fair Packaging and Labeling Program by adding language that requires manufacturers to state (in a conspicuous location) that the package contains a radio frequency identification tag that can transmit unique identification information to a "reader" device both before and AFTER it's purchased(!). This is where you come in. The bill needs a sponsor. Maybe YOUR Congressional Representative would like to go on record as having helped stop this assault on our privacy. Forward this article to him/her and tell them the entire text of the bill can been seen at nocards.org. Will you make it a point to email, call or fax your representative today, before our Big Brother gets any bigger? Do it NOW before the lobbyists and big money special interests get to them and convince Congress these RFID chips are consumer-friendly! And while you're at it, why not tell the suits at Wal-Mart and Gillette (and Home Depot, Proctor and Gamble and Johnson & Johnson, too, by the way) that from here on out you wouldn't go near their stores or their products with a ten foot pole. It works. Remember back a few months when I told you how Italian clothing company Benetton had chipped their Sisely line of clothes and was all set to roll out the garments with RFID tracking devices? Well your outrage and feedback caused them to put the scheme on hold. Let's make sure the behemoth Wal-Mart is similarly put on notice. (By the way, IBM's planning to add RFID to it's products; so if Wal-Mart manages to sneak this past us, all bets are off and then every corporate giant will be able to inflict this chilling, tracking/monitoring horror on us.) If RFID gets off the ground as planned, that would make George Orwells' predictions off by just 20 years. It's up to us. © 2003 Mary Starrett - All Rights Reserved |
|
Jun 16th, 2003 02:00 PM | ||
kellychaos |
From a friend on another board. Funny stuff: Quote:
|
|
Jun 13th, 2003 01:50 PM | ||
UnDeath | yeah, but that kind of stuff has documented pictures. | |
Jun 13th, 2003 01:45 PM | ||
Jeanette X |
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() This is about as rare as a lioness adopting an oryx. |
|
Jun 13th, 2003 01:36 PM | ||
Immortal Goat | That's a very valid point, GAsux. Thank you for the advice. If I ever want to get laid by a girl who will one day have as much facial hair as Saddam, I will be nice to the door greeters at Wal-Mart. | |
Jun 13th, 2003 01:18 PM | ||
GAsux |
Words from the wise... I worked at al Wal-Mart for two years here in Cali while I was going to a J.C. Don't knock the door greeters. While old and overly mustachioed, those ladies have granddaughters. And granddaughters rule. You get in good with the bearded lady at the door, and you might find yourself with an express ticket to the granddaughter gravy train. |
|
Jun 13th, 2003 01:02 PM | ||
Vibecrewangel |
Sad I remember when Safeway and Lucky's did that to the small grocery stores. We had one that had the best produce department and butcher shop right down the street. They just couldn't compete with the big supermarkets. Now I have go out of my way to get a decent cut of meat if I want something other than than the crap Albertson's and Safeway carry. |
|
Jun 13th, 2003 12:57 PM | ||
kellychaos | I live in a rural area and Kmart did the "vampire" thing to our local businesses too. The strip mall, which includes Kmart and a cineplex, lies about 3 miles outside of town has been there about 20 years or so and has slowly sucked all the life out of the local small businesses, some of which had been in business upwards of 50 years. | |
Jun 13th, 2003 12:46 PM | ||
Protoclown |
Quote:
|
|
Jun 13th, 2003 10:52 AM | ||
Immortal Goat |
MBurbank: "I never shop there. They are VERY bad for small, local businesses." VinceZeb: "But it does hurt small business, so I try not to shop there unless I need to get a bunch of different things at one time, but unfortuantly, they are the only place to get video games and other items." Mark this day on your calendar, ladies and gentlemen, Vinth and Max agreed on something. |
|
Jun 13th, 2003 09:46 AM | ||
VinceZeb |
I love Wal-Mart. It is the Mecca of my hometown. Up on a big hill, it is. They make us pray to it 5 times a day. The Supercenter is the hub of the nightly social life as well. But it does hurt small business, so I try not to shop there unless I need to get a bunch of different things at one time, but unfortuantly, they are the only place to get video games and other items. |
|
Jun 13th, 2003 09:13 AM | ||
mburbank | I never shop there. They are VERY bad for small, local businesses. | |
Jun 12th, 2003 10:59 PM | ||
Protoclown |
I hate Wal-Mart. Sadly however, I am getting ready to go there with my roommate to go grocery shopping. Since it's the only place that's really open right now. |
|
Jun 12th, 2003 10:50 PM | ||
Immortal Goat | That, and also because at the one near me, the women that work there have more facial hair than the men. | |
Jun 12th, 2003 10:16 PM | ||
Isaac | and there greeters scare the shit out of me | |
Jun 12th, 2003 10:06 PM | ||
Jeanette X |
Don't shop at Walmart. From www.walmartwatch.com Top 10 Wal-Mart Worst Actions A judge fined Wal-Mart $18 million because the company provided incomplete and false evidence in a lawsuit brought by a woman who had been abducted in a Wal-Mart parking lot. Upholding a $2.3 million verdict awarded to two women sexually harassed by a Wal-Mart manager, the judge said, the manager's conduct was "outrageous and apparently Wal-Mart was aware of this, since his conduct was witnessed high-level [supervisors]. Federal judges in three states have fined Wal-Mart--as much as $120,000--for destroying evidence, withholding documents, and other violations in cases where Wal-Mart shoppers were either injured or a crime victim at a Wal-Mart store. A jury found that Wal-Mart fired a white female employee because she was dating a black man, in a 1998 case. A 14-year Wal-Mart worker was awarded $2.75 million after a jury decided store officials wrongly accused her of stealing. Three existing community jobs are destroyed for every two new jobs at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart, the company that wrapped itself in the American Flag, is so patriotic it runs a Buy Mexican campaign. Wal-Mart sold fake Tommy Hilfiger apparel to consumers after a judged ordered the company to stop. Only 38% of Wal-Mart employees have company provided health insurance--compared to a national average that shows 60% of employees are covered by company plans. After the FTC charged Wal-Mart with not identifying the country of origin on apparel items listed on its Internet sales site, Wal-Mart removed the items, apparently preferring not to disclose where the clothing was made. More anti-Walmart: http://members.aol.com/walmopboy/abuse/wst.htm http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill...1/release.html www.walmartvswomen.com http://www.bit-net.com/~dka/Resources/Best%20Links.html http://www.hel-mart.com/links.php |