Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > Bush and his chums fucked up? YA DON'T SAY!
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: Bush and his chums fucked up? YA DON'T SAY! Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Jul 14th, 2003 03:21 PM
Zero Signal Bush also called Africa a nation.
Jul 14th, 2003 03:13 PM
mburbank (AP) - President Bush defended the quality of intelligence he receives as "darn good" despite an uproar over disputed reports that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Africa for nuclear weapons.




Tee hee. Is 'Darn Good' as good as 'Damn Good.'?



I love the latest spin.

The gist is, see, the claim that Saddam was trying to purchase Uranium from Nigeria is true, see, it's just the evidence of it we had that was false. The British have real true evidence, but they won't let us see it.

And the question of who forged the evidence and why? That there's one of them revigionsit questions.
Jul 11th, 2003 03:07 PM
mburbank laughing emoticon.
Jul 11th, 2003 02:21 PM
The One and Only... I think mburbank has ego issues, because he apparently feels necessary to quote everything Vince says.

Just like to point that out.
Jul 11th, 2003 11:19 AM
mburbank "Now liberals all you want to have done is to be at the discreditting of bush when who was the perjury during his Presidention and got the impeachment over it? Clinton. Now how come I don't not have the hearing about that from you now? I'll say this about myself and remember it's me saying on myself the things, if you are so stupid you can't see that in terms of presidentng you can't know a proven thing about bush without which the first having compared to which Clinto also having done things then what can you say? Oh, I forgot, nothing. But now you liberals would believe that a bad thing by Bush was been done by him even if the source was anyhthing at all if it said a bad thing about Bush by him which is what liberals do. Dumbass. Uhm... also your mothers all is sucking on my cock."
-Vinth McCraniallethions
Jul 10th, 2003 09:59 PM
Zebra 3
I Feel Your Pain, Vinth

Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
You all think Clinton's little ordeal was nothing important but will say the president lied without any proof whatsoever.
- Ken Starr spent over $60M of taxpayers money on that whole fuckin' cigargate investigation - that money would of been plenty to build 'the Bridge to the 21st century'.
Jul 10th, 2003 09:32 PM
Drew Katsikas CLINTON HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS!! We aren't comparing presidents, Vinth!
Although I may agree that Bush lied, the argument is that he fucked up. Maybe you would be able to make a slightly reasonable comeback if you read the title of the post correctly! Wait, who am I kidding, even with full information you would still spit out some brainless incoherent reply.
Jul 10th, 2003 07:59 PM
VinceZeb I'm saying this:

Bush has not under any burden of proof lied.

Clinton was convicted of perjury that has nothing to do with Monica.

You all think Clinton's little ordeal was nothing important but will say the president lied without any proof whatsoever.
Jul 10th, 2003 02:13 PM
Zebra 3
NEWS?

:/ - The only new thing here is that there's now another overpaid White House mouth piece that's admitting the Nigerian documents were a crude forgery. The CIA conluded all this and was on TV and in all the newspapers before the Iraqi invasion. Its worth noting, Colin Powell submitted this forged document at an U.N. meeting as proof that Iraq was building WMDs.
Jul 10th, 2003 01:27 PM
FS What is so funny is that Vince is contesting the definition of the word "lie" in the exact same manner that Clinton contested the definition of "sexual relations".

Vince, what exactly are you trying to prove? That Bush is no less a dickhead than Clinton? Bush gave the world certainties and confirmations that he knew were at best shady and at worst picked out of a hat. Now you can balk all you want about how this does not constitue as a lie, but tell me this: was Bush HONEST to the American public when he told them he was certain of the threat of Iraq?
Jul 10th, 2003 01:03 PM
Protoclown The Democrat. DUH!
Jul 10th, 2003 11:12 AM
Bennett Vince, you ignorant slut.

I have seen more than one person on this board cite their disagreements with Clintons military actions. Burbank and Helm to name two, since you don't remember. At the time I was very vocal about the issue, as well, not only about the morality of the actions, but at the lack of media coverage of our international bombing, and the general apathy of the American public.

This is consistency, when you disagree with military actions and the deaths of innocents no matter the political party involved.

As far as looking for a rope to tie around someone's neck, why are you still talking about Clinton getting a b.j.? As a Libertarian, I would think you would understand that this is a part of the man's private life, and drop the Ken Starr witch-hunt already.

And as usual, you've avoided the initial comment made by FS, that on one hand you have a person who lied about getting head, and you have another who lied in order to start a war, which in turn killed thousands of people. Which is worse, Vinth?
Jul 10th, 2003 11:08 AM
Drew Katsikas
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
Your response proves the intelligent of this message board.
Wow. Your stupidity is uncanny.


Bill Clinton's long gone buddy! He got his dick sucked, and lied about it. Already been dealt with a couple years ago. Your completley irrelevant comeback is, well, completley irrelevant. We're saying that Bush made a statement which he claimed was fact, which has been recently disproven. He really fucked up, because this is a war, not oral sex. We're not bashing Republicans, or trying to say "ooh look, now Bush's a liar and so Clinton isn't so bad." That's not the argument at hand here, Vinth, I thought even you could realize something so simple.
Jul 10th, 2003 11:01 AM
VinceZeb Your response proves the intelligent of this message board.

Just admit that all the liberals are trying to find a rope they can tie around Bush's neck, and you might actually have something now.

What about Clinton with the bombing of the asprin factory? Amazingly enough, that hasn't been brought up yet. But then again, I am asking for constinency from liberals, which means the only thing that can be expected from you is to be ignorant of the situation time and time and TIME again.
Jul 10th, 2003 10:59 AM
Bennett Is your retort relevant? Are you a proven moron?
Jul 10th, 2003 07:58 AM
VinceZeb Did George Bush get impeached? Is George Bush a PROVEN liar?


Did Bill Clinton get impeached? Is Bill Clinton a PROVEN liar?
Jul 10th, 2003 06:55 AM
FS But, don't you see? A president lying about getting head is A THOUSAND TIMES worse than a president lying about the threat of another nation in order to start a war that kills 3000+ people.
Jul 9th, 2003 07:21 PM
Anti-Xocial
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
It's important becuase it proved our former president is a two-faced liar.
Indeed...so unlike our current president, who is so straight-up and honest In (hopefully) a year, when gwb is gone, they will have revealed all the crap georgie-boy has swept under the carpet during all these years of his term. I think you little boy will see how gulliable you have been!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zero Signal
I see some of you still naively believe that who is President actually matters. The agendas will roll on, no matter who is in office. An inexorable march towards destiny.
Read vincezeb! Read, learn and grow-up......
Jul 9th, 2003 03:56 PM
Jeanette X
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
He also lied and said he invented the internet.
No, he didn't say that. He claimed that he had helped to pass legislation that was key in making the internet what it is.
Jul 9th, 2003 03:47 PM
The One and Only...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
Ya know, I'm even more scared to think how many times Al Gore would have fucked up.
That is so retarded a statement. So many people assume Gore would have sucked ass dealing with 9/11 but upon what is that assumption based? He's infinitely more intelligent that Bush. People don't give him nearly enough credit.
He was a senator(?) and a vice president, being horrible at both. He also lied and said he invented the internet. I think that's enough to say he would have been a horrible president.
Jul 9th, 2003 12:13 PM
Zero Signal I see some of you still naively believe that who is President actually matters. The agendas will roll on, no matter who is in office. An inexorable march towards destiny.
Jul 9th, 2003 09:20 AM
VinceZeb It's important becuase it proved our former president is a two-faced liar.
Jul 9th, 2003 09:13 AM
Mockery
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
Wow, the BBC has something about it... what a shock. They would report that Bush is a sexual deviant if they could find a cousin's brother's uncle's nephew's cousin that would say he is.
Coming from a guy who's still talking about Bill Clinton's past sexual endeavors, that argument hardly holds any water.
Jul 9th, 2003 08:29 AM
VinceZeb Wow, the BBC has something about it... what a shock. They would report that Bush is a sexual deviant if they could find a cousin's brother's uncle's nephew's cousin that would say he is.
Jul 9th, 2003 08:21 AM
Mockery More on the uranium story...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3056626.stm
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:41 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.