|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Mar 17th, 2004 11:11 PM | |
| Rez |
because this was from a 21 and over club. its reasonable to assume people in there would be at least 18. not 16. in an 18 and over club, definately, in a 21 and over, definately not. blame the assheads at the gate for not checking the friggin ID. |
| Mar 17th, 2004 08:18 PM | |
| Matt Harty | I'd listen to someone charged with anything if the music was good. |
| Mar 17th, 2004 07:40 PM | |
| DementedElf |
I am sure it's cause people generally like to ignore things or that they are just sick fucks who like fucking little kids as well. The pictures however you can most likely blame the ACLU or whatever other pussy group that believes that just because the pictures might have been seized incorrectly that it isn't really usable. Rules of Evidence I believe they call it or some other same shit. Fact is if it was one of their kids that was in the pictures that were not usable they would be screaming "fuck the evidence!" at the top of their lungs because it was their precious child that was damaged by this sick fuck. |
| Mar 17th, 2004 05:43 PM | |
| bigtimecow |
hes hiding the cassidy hotel 
|
| Mar 17th, 2004 04:35 PM | |
| Bennett |
R. Kelly Okay this is a little bit of a rant, but I don't understand: 1. How is this guy getting off on all of the charges against him? 2. Why are radio stations still playing songs (why are people still buying songs) about bringing girls back to hotel rooms, etc. from a guy who is not only accused of having sex with little girls, but is on video doing so (though he says it isn't him, there are also pictures of him doing so that are inadmissable in court because they were "improperly seized")? This seems ironic to me in a very very sick way. |
