Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > So kulturkampf...
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: So kulturkampf... Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Jan 26th, 2006 09:24 AM
mburbank I don't frown upon it.

Do you not even know what the word 'all' means? How is anyone supposed to communicate with you, let lone argue. How are you going to 'wrap' anything around 'unatrural' if you don't even know what 'all' means?


So... are you pro boy fucking?
Jan 26th, 2006 05:49 AM
Kulturkampf
Quote:
Originally Posted by derrida
Maybe I misread your response, Kulturkampf but it seems to me that the examples you raise give credence to the idea that sexualities are at least partially socially constructed. If the lack of a homosexual sex taboo results in an apparent increase in homosexual behavior we can conclude that the exhibition (if not the genesis) of such behavior is influenced in part by social norms. (If you are interested I can look up scholarly articles for you regarding societies that are almost exclusively homosexual save for procreative sex)
]

Sexuality is partiallyc onstructed in the sense that in some societies promiscuity is condoned, and others is not; ti is also constructed as far as in some societies boy fucking is considered proper and fine, but i others it is not.

But even in Greek and Afghani cutlure, which had/have rich heritage in boy-fucking, literal homosexuality between man and man, not man and boy, is forbidden and punishable by ddeat in afghanistan and was punishable with forfeiture of all citizenship in Greece.

Facts are facts, and as a pink flamingo I only adhere to facts.
Jan 26th, 2006 05:47 AM
Kulturkampf
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
It is frowned upon by all people and practiced by an extreme minority of humans because it is....

unnatural.

Wrap your brain around a word.
Really? So I suppose cars are frowned upon as well? And the internet?
Cars are not naturally occurring, but they are created tools and objects by humans that serve express purposes.

It is not natural to be born without legs or to be born blind, it is not normal; some sort of error occurred in the birth. However, would you say that it was natural?

In the broadest sense, it is anatural birth; but it is not a natural, normal, and healthy baby by any stretch.

Machines and humans are entirely different.

(and I am the pinkest flamingo)
Jan 25th, 2006 09:24 PM
derrida Maybe I misread your response, Kulturkampf but it seems to me that the examples you raise give credence to the idea that sexualities are at least partially socially constructed. If the lack of a homosexual sex taboo results in an apparent increase in homosexual behavior we can conclude that the exhibition (if not the genesis) of such behavior is influenced in part by social norms. (If you are interested I can look up scholarly articles for you regarding societies that are almost exclusively homosexual save for procreative sex)
Jan 25th, 2006 08:47 PM
The One and Only...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
It is frowned upon by all people and practiced by an extreme minority of humans because it is....

unnatural.

Wrap your brain around a word.
Really? So I suppose cars are frowned upon as well? And the internet?
Jan 25th, 2006 09:13 AM
mburbank I don't frown upon it.

Do you not even know what the word 'all' means? How is anyone supposed to communicate with you, let lone argue. How are you going to 'wrap' anything around 'unatrural' if you don't even know what 'all' means?
Jan 25th, 2006 06:30 AM
Kulturkampf Pedantry, I believe.

It is frowned upon by all people and practiced by an extreme minority of humans because it is....

unnatural.

Wrap your brain around a word.
Jan 24th, 2006 08:46 PM
Chojin
Jan 24th, 2006 05:37 PM
ScruU2wice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
very few people actually practice man-to-man love,
LOL
Jan 24th, 2006 05:20 PM
Kulturkampf
Quote:
Originally Posted by mburbank
I'm sorry, I can't understand a word he said. Seriously. I THINK he's saying that adult homosexuality has always been taboo in every society and that this inherently means it's unnatural, but damn, it takes a lot of translation and leaps of Lingual faith to get to that meaning.

KittyKrap, if that's what you meant, how do you draw your conclusion, that universal Taboos are neccesarily unnatural? And what do you mean by universal? Because my guess is homos throghout history haven't embraced a taboo against their actions. So if 75% of folks always felt it was wrong, then it is? Or would 70% turn opinion into fact? What about 51%? What's your magic number fo0r making opinion fact?

Or am I totally wrong about what you were saying and what you really meant is your attrcated to pre-pubescent boys and you feel bad about it. 'Cause that seemed to be in there too.
The amount of people who are homosexuals in that sense have always been extremely few; very few people actually practice man-to-man love, so to speak, and so it is a deviation in sexual desire (which of course means nothing to a relativist).
Jan 24th, 2006 04:33 PM
mburbank CAT FIGHT!!!
Jan 24th, 2006 04:28 PM
The One and Only...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
I would point to societies, such as the Greeks, where even a degree of homosexuality was practiced or such as the Afghans, who though practiced pedastery (sp?), never thought it acceptable that their homosexuality would be an attraction to other adult men.

Even in societies that had no gender construct that would inherently pressure someone to be a heterosexual and even where havign sex with boys was acceptable, it eventually was viewed that a literal practice of homosexuality between two men acting as grown-up lovers was taboo.

Basically, in every society except a few where fucking young boys was cool, homosexuality has been viewed as not an acceptable way of life. It is not a natural form to the human.
So what? How it was viewed has absolutely nothing to do with it being natural.
Jan 24th, 2006 01:02 PM
Emu
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
I would point to societies, such as the Greeks, where even a degree of homosexuality was practiced ... never thought it acceptable that their homosexuality would be an attraction to other adult men.
Now it makes sense. Sorta.

Since when?

Edit: Also:

No entry found for pedastery.
Did you mean Poetastry?

Suggestions:
Poetastry
pedantry
plastery
pastry
poetaster
poetasters
poetaster's
poetasters'
lead story
pieds-a-terre
pieds-Ã -terre

Poetastry

\Po"et*as`try\, n. The works of a poetaster. [R.]

Jan 24th, 2006 12:59 PM
kahljorn He's saying it's okay to be a Pedophile.
Jan 24th, 2006 11:55 AM
mburbank I'm sorry, I can't understand a word he said. Seriously. I THINK he's saying that adult homosexuality has always been taboo in every society and that this inherently means it's unnatural, but damn, it takes a lot of translation and leaps of Lingual faith to get to that meaning.

KittyKrap, if that's what you meant, how do you draw your conclusion, that universal Taboos are neccesarily unnatural? And what do you mean by universal? Because my guess is homos throghout history haven't embraced a taboo against their actions. So if 75% of folks always felt it was wrong, then it is? Or would 70% turn opinion into fact? What about 51%? What's your magic number fo0r making opinion fact?

Or am I totally wrong about what you were saying and what you really meant is your attrcated to pre-pubescent boys and you feel bad about it. 'Cause that seemed to be in there too.
Jan 24th, 2006 10:57 AM
ziggytrix translation:

Adult male to young male homosexuality is a wonderful part of human nature, but adult male to adult male homosexuality is an abomination before God or Nature.

I'm flabbergasted!
Jan 24th, 2006 07:38 AM
Chojin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
I would point to societies, such as the Greeks, where even a degree of homosexuality was practiced or such as the Afghans, who though practiced pedastery (sp?), never thought it acceptable that their homosexuality would be an attraction to other adult men.
...what?
Jan 24th, 2006 03:48 AM
Kulturkampf I would point to societies, such as the Greeks, where even a degree of homosexuality was practiced or such as the Afghans, who though practiced pedastery (sp?), never thought it acceptable that their homosexuality would be an attraction to other adult men.

Even in societies that had no gender construct that would inherently pressure someone to be a heterosexual and even where havign sex with boys was acceptable, it eventually was viewed that a literal practice of homosexuality between two men acting as grown-up lovers was taboo.

Basically, in every society except a few where fucking young boys was cool, homosexuality has been viewed as not an acceptable way of life. It is not a natural form to the human.
Jan 24th, 2006 12:01 AM
Immortal Goat Goddammit, OAO, NEVER FUCKING MAKE ME AGREE WITH YOU AGAIN!

On a serious note, if even OAO is making valid points where KummedinKilt can't, then we, my friends, have found ourselves a real keeper. Let's NEVER let him leave, like Vinth did.
Jan 23rd, 2006 09:20 PM
ziggytrix Genesis 5:2
Jan 23rd, 2006 08:56 PM
The One and Only...
Re: So kulturkampf...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
I would be lying if I said I did.
K.

Quote:
Trying to regain some ego over the deconstructionist bit?
I have ego I need to regain?

Quote:
It is okay, I am sure you are smarter than me, so go ahead and make your point.
My point is that you need to STFU you incredible N3WB.

Seriously, why do you refuse to accept sexuality as at least partially socially constructed?
Jan 23rd, 2006 06:02 PM
ScruU2wice seriously OAO vs. KKKlap was going to be awesome
Jan 23rd, 2006 12:32 PM
Cosmo Electrolux OAO is probably going to try to blow him anyway...or is he not bisexual anymore?....I've lost track.
Jan 23rd, 2006 11:02 AM
AChimp SORRY I PANICKED.
Jan 23rd, 2006 10:21 AM
Emu I think these babies will require more than a hammer. I have a few wooden stakes.
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.