|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Apr 6th, 2007 11:56 AM | ||
| arg_zombies |
i loved 28 days, so hopefully this will live up to the name.... But don't get your hopes up people - how many good sequels have been made? Not many. |
|
| Mar 28th, 2007 01:56 PM | ||
| Jeff The Ninja | This one looks too action oriented compared to the original. The Original was good for the beginning, where they set up that feeling of complete isolation. Just shots of the street completly barren and lifeless. Too bad there werent any real zombies, just people with a crazy virus. | |
| Mar 28th, 2007 10:50 AM | ||
| rocketsauce |
Quote:
|
|
| Mar 28th, 2007 12:34 AM | ||
| ArrowX | god damn it fucking little kids in everything. looks like its gonna be sweet ass regardless, I love those wide shots of abandoned cities in these kinds of movies, because there so surreal. | |
| Mar 27th, 2007 07:35 PM | ||
| Blue Fox |
wait, if this is the sequel of the movie i think it is (where the british guy wakes up and monkeys have escaped and spread an experimental disease everywhere that has killed almost everyone, etc.) then we can expect: RAGE INFECTED MONKIES!!!! woot! Those were the coolest monkies ever! and the movie was pretty kick-butt too. 
|
|
| Mar 27th, 2007 04:48 PM | ||
| Sacks | It doesn't look as visually striking as the first one. In fact it looks kind of made for TV. | |
| Mar 27th, 2007 04:32 PM | ||
| Zomboid | Probably wouldn't be as good anyway, but I hope it is. The first one is one of the best newer zombie movies around. | |
| Mar 27th, 2007 03:02 PM | ||
| noob3 |
HELL YES. If a sequel would instantly excite me, it would be this. I don't think there is better, more realistic zombie flicks out there. BUT WHY DOES IT SAY "THE PRODUCERS" AND NOT "THE DIRECTOR" !?!?! This is making me think it will suck 
|
|
| Mar 27th, 2007 01:31 PM | ||
| rocketsauce |
28 Weeks Later 28 Weeks Later The cannibal pseudo-zombies of 28 Days Later are back. |
|
