what's so offensive about a poster? for an Andy Warhol movie?
It's entitled BAD, so that it's really a BAD poster!
Puntastic!
...
Nov 30th, 2005 06:26 PM
ScruU2wice
and a person eating a mushroom for 45 minutes.
Nov 30th, 2005 06:21 PM
Orange Juice Bruce
Because I REALLY HATE Campbell's soup.
Nov 30th, 2005 06:18 PM
Juttin
what's so offensive about a poster? for an Andy Warhol movie?
Nov 30th, 2005 05:47 PM
Orange Juice Bruce
Find some bad posters, eh? Then I nominate you, Dr. Fu
Don't let us down!
Nov 30th, 2005 05:17 PM
Dr. Fu
You guys just bumped my thread up!
Thanks.
No need to lock it. We still have to identify some bad posters.
Nov 30th, 2005 04:32 PM
Pub Lover
Quote:
Originally Posted by kellychaos
...if not for the ban on single-emoticon posting...
Is that a real rule? I thought I made it up to be an ass to some newb. :/
Edit:
Nevermind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forum Rules
3) When posting a new topic, please make sure it's something at least semi worthwhile. A post that simply contains the word "hi" or a single emoticon generally isn't going to do anything except waste people's time. If the majority of your posts are shorter than your signature file, that's probably a clear sign that you're not really adding anything valuable to any conversations.
Nov 30th, 2005 04:24 PM
Orange Juice Bruce
Can someone lock this thread? kthxbye
Nov 30th, 2005 04:04 PM
kellychaos
if not for the ban on single-emoticon posting, i'd be posting that sad, teary-eyed thingy right now ... it reminds me of that indian that used to do the public service commercials against pollution ... and other sad stuff like cable movies on the Oxygen channel starring Meredith Baxter Birney or Susan Lucci
Nov 30th, 2005 01:43 PM
Emu
this thread
Nov 30th, 2005 02:21 AM
The Retro Kat
Shiyat, he just got strate teribled. How u gonna act, playa?