| Jan 31st, 2007 11:19 AM |
| DuFresne |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jixby Phillips
Question: Does relative timestamps fade after a certain ammount of time? Like I hate the idea of every post that happened 12-23 months ago would say ONE YEAR AGO on it. Like there are honestly times when I have to track down the date of something and I wind up using message board posts and stuff to gage that. Would I be able to get the actual date of a post by clicking the time stamp or something?
|
I think he makes a good point.
|
| Jan 31st, 2007 06:08 AM |
| sadie |
okay, well, zelda, this thread isn't about how many posts per page. moron.
and polls still suck, and who cares about timestamps anyway? what's the big deal?
|
| Jan 31st, 2007 12:19 AM |
| zeldasbiggestfan |
Cant you just let us pick in our profile like how many posts per page?
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 11:53 PM |
| Chojin |
Well it was, wasn't it
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 11:50 PM |
| Esuohlim |
As I mentioned before, this board started off with relative timestamps and I seriously saw "1 week ago" for all the threads at the bottom of General Blabber's page one.
You're making a big mistake here!
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 11:46 PM |
| Chojin |
Except the combo doesn't tell you a relative time, it just says 'yesterday' or 'today' or nothing next to a full timestamp. IDEALLY, we should have a full timestamp with (5 minutes ago) or something after it, but there's no option for that because that would be great.
Also Jix it's my understanding that the relative timestamp goes to a full after 24 hours, but i know fo sho it goes to a full one after a month or two.
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 11:39 PM |
| Emu |
Srsly.
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 10:43 PM |
| Black Flag |
honestly there is no reason not to do the combo
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 10:35 PM |
| Emu |
All the posts have dates attached to them regardless of what kind of time stamp you have. Ideally though the combo timestamp would explire after two days and regress into a full timestamp after that period. I really don't get why people would want one or the other when you have both.
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 10:33 PM |
| Jixby Phillips |
Question: Does relative timestamps fade after a certain ammount of time? Like I hate the idea of every post that happened 12-23 months ago would say ONE YEAR AGO on it. Like there are honestly times when I have to track down the date of something and I wind up using message board posts and stuff to gage that. Would I be able to get the actual date of a post by clicking the time stamp or something?
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 10:29 PM |
| Emu |
grammAr
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 10:15 PM |
| Juttin |
lol @ bad grammer manipulation
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 04:34 PM |
| Emu |
I feel that this thread is important enough to be a sticky
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 02:49 PM |
| Chojin |
it's set to 2 weeks.
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 02:40 PM |
| liquidstatik |
whens this poll gonna be over? ;o
relative is tottally winning
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 02:34 PM |
| GADZOOKS |
Can we have NO TIMESTAMPS and everything will be like mysterious.
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 02:23 PM |
| noob3 |
man this imockery administration is crooked dudes we better rebel against them
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 02:22 PM |
| Chojin |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esuohlim
Chojin you went into this knowing full well that mentioning your preference right off the bat would skew the popular opinion
|
AH HA HA! AH HA HA! AH HA HA HA!
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 01:28 PM |
| Black Flag |
for real, then everyone will be happy
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 01:15 PM |
| noob3 |
let's just do combo 
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 01:00 PM |
| Esuohlim |
Chojin you went into this knowing full well that mentioning your preference right off the bat would skew the popular opinion
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 12:54 PM |
| Chojin |
RELATIVE TIMESTAMPS IS ONE VOTE SHY OF A MANDATE, GUYS 
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 12:46 PM |
| Esuohlim |
cool now to what?
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 12:39 PM |
| DuFresne |
hey emu can i be cool now to?
|
| Jan 30th, 2007 10:46 AM |
| Emu |
Actually isn't there some way you can set it up so each person can choose which display mode is used? It seems weird that you'd have to set the entire forum to see it one way.
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
