Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > It's a good thing we got rid of all that sexism in the 70s
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: It's a good thing we got rid of all that sexism in the 70s Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Mar 12th, 2004 07:23 AM
Dole
Quote:
191 lbs. 5'9", large body type. Don't know where that puts me...
...front of the pie queue presumably.
Mar 11th, 2004 05:30 PM
The One and Only... It's... closer to a 20-40 lbs overage...

And I was thinking of my face...
Mar 11th, 2004 05:00 PM
kellychaos Well ... hell ... the freakishly large penis alone is enough to offset that pesky 50 lb overage.
Mar 11th, 2004 04:53 PM
The One and Only... I don't plan to work in a field where attractiveness is much of a factor.

Even if I did, my other attributes would offset my weight.
Mar 10th, 2004 08:56 PM
Perndog Pay attention Jean; only fat women are the losers.
Mar 10th, 2004 03:55 PM
Jeanette X
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
I know that I'm "pretty chubby" (aka: a fatass), but for someone my size, I really don't look that big.

Until I take off my clothes...
That means that an employer can pay you less because you're fat! Hooray for laissez-faire capitalism! No raise for you, tubby!
Mar 9th, 2004 09:47 PM
phnompehn If I were Richard Simmons, and you lost all that weight, I'd drive by your house and toot my horn. Then I'd pee in your mailbox.
Mar 9th, 2004 09:41 PM
Zhukov If I was a fat woman, I would kill you and take your business.
Mar 9th, 2004 09:19 PM
Anonymouse If I were a business owner, I would not hire a fat chick. And assuming I did, I would only pay them subsistence wage so they can buy fried chicken.
Mar 9th, 2004 08:21 PM
The One and Only... I know that I'm "pretty chubby" (aka: a fatass), but for someone my size, I really don't look that big.

Until I take off my clothes...
Mar 9th, 2004 06:16 PM
Perndog
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanette X
And just how much do you weigh again?
191 lbs. 5'9", large body type. Don't know where that puts me...
Unless you're so stacked that you bench over 250, 191 lbs at 5'9" is pretty chubby. But at least you have a few notches up on Vince for admitting it.
Mar 9th, 2004 04:28 PM
El Blanco Kind of depends on the job. If you are in sales or somesort of customer service, personal appearance plays a large part in your job.

Personality also goes a long way.

And if you are willing to train and the pay is low, then experience doesn't rank too high.
Mar 9th, 2004 04:22 PM
kellychaos Please priotize the characteristics that get you the job as you see fit:

Physical attractiveness
Personality
Personal Connections
Personality
Educational Experience
Personal Experience
Talent

P.S. Gratuitus sex optional.
Mar 9th, 2004 04:01 PM
The One and Only...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanette X
And just how much do you weigh again?
191 lbs. 5'9", large body type. Don't know where that puts me...
Mar 9th, 2004 08:24 AM
Zhukov Oh, hey, what are you guys doing for International Womens Day?
Mar 9th, 2004 08:12 AM
davinxtk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perndog
For some people (me) sex is a pretty low priority and even among the beautiful women there's only one in a thousand that contributes anything to my life just by looking good. I'd usually rather look at a building.

I second that.
Mar 9th, 2004 12:03 AM
El Blanco Ya, but Carpal Tunnel Syndrome can be a bitch.

Also, sometimes a substitute just won't cut it.
Mar 8th, 2004 11:57 PM
Emu Oh mesobe, you casanova.
Mar 8th, 2004 11:55 PM
mesobe a bit of lotion and some tissues saves you the hassle and the expense of having to get into a chicks panties.
Mar 8th, 2004 10:59 PM
Perndog For some people (me) sex is a pretty low priority and even among the beautiful women there's only one in a thousand that contributes anything to my life just by looking good. I'd usually rather look at a building.
Mar 8th, 2004 10:57 PM
El Blanco
Quote:
three quarters of them would still be ugly, vapid, or both.
You can get a paper bag for the ugly ones and as for vapid, who cares what they have to say in the first place?
Mar 8th, 2004 10:35 PM
Perndog I guess that means women aren't rational then, huh?

Or some women aren't interested in sex and are happy with jobs that will hire fat women.
Mar 8th, 2004 10:09 PM
Emu I quoted you in my sig. I thought that was good for some reason.

But AREN'T there "incentives" to be thin already? You're more likely to get fucked, you'll probably get a better job, and all that other crap that our country focuses on instead of more important things?
Mar 8th, 2004 10:04 PM
Perndog He means, assuming women are rational and there are incentives to be thin, fat chicks will lose weight for those incentives.
Mar 8th, 2004 09:54 PM
Emu
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One and Only...
By lowering the incentive to stay fat, or rather increasing the incentive to be thin, we should see an increase in the number of thin chicks over time assuming rationality among women.
What the hell does weight have to do with rationality? I've met thin smart chicks, and I've met dipshit fat chicks.
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.