| Oct 22nd, 2006 10:11 PM |
| Miss Modular |
genus
genios
gennus
genieus
gellis
jealios
jealous
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 07:44 PM |
| Emu |
What is it about the word "genious" that nobody can spell it right?
YES RETARDS I SPELLED IT WRONG ON PURPOSE. I KNOW IT'S SPELLED GEANIUS.
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 07:41 PM |
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Dick.
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 06:59 PM |
| Ant10708 |
You must be a genuis Miss Modular for figuring that one out.
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 05:19 PM |
| Miss Modular |
Well, I just watched the 9/11 episode (Thanks, YouTube!), and I got the impression that they were making fun of people like Geggy.
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 12:46 PM |
| Emu |
Thread Backups please!
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 12:31 PM |
| Grislygus |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ranxer
what's the latest? 14 seconds? no not free fall, uniform but yes there was some resistance to being pulled into its footprint, you're correct.
|
Doubletalk. Doubletalk doubletalk DOUBLETALK. 
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 10:30 AM |
| AChimp |
Now I have a raging clue that points to Boogie's post.
|
| Oct 22nd, 2006 02:03 AM |
| Dr. Boogie |
For those of you just joining this thread:
Geggy attempts once again to explain how 9/11 was an inside job, and expects others to believe him despite his inability to grasp the nature of a recent South Park episode concerning the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Later, 9/11 conspiracy evidence is presented and refuted as it has been in countless other threads.
|
| Oct 21st, 2006 10:11 PM |
| Emu |
All I have to say about this thread is "what the fuck"
|
| Oct 21st, 2006 09:51 PM |
| ranxer |
what's the latest? 14 seconds? no not free fall, uniform but yes there was some resistance to being pulled into its footprint, you're correct.
|
| Oct 21st, 2006 01:59 PM |
| El Blanco |
it wasn't freefall.
Why the hell am I going over this again?
|
| Oct 21st, 2006 11:11 AM |
| ranxer |
yea and as southpark failed to mention, a 25% damage to one facia of a building leads to a total uniform collapse at a nearly freefall speed 8/
loose change final edition will cover this pretty well including some of the most complete video footage of the south side of building 7 i've ever seen.
|
| Oct 20th, 2006 10:42 PM |
| El Blanco |
Ya, I'd say close to 25% exterior damage is "peppered".
And those images aren't that hard to find.
|
| Oct 20th, 2006 09:20 PM |
| ranxer |
sure, it was pretty peppered with damage, the images are a little hard to find though.
|
| Oct 20th, 2006 08:14 PM |
| El Blanco |
Quote:
|
Also it's kind of exciting watching the world and the media evolve around about what I do
|
Bingo. Thats it. Right there. Thats what I've been saying.
Its not about the truth. Its not about justicce. It has nothing to do with the victims.
Its all about you. How can you be noticed.
I was going to write a big response to you. I was going to detail how wrong you are. Half of it would be things I've said many times before. And I'd knew it would be fruitless.
But you saved me the trouble. In fact, you've saved me the trouble of ever responding to you again. I'll just put in this little quote and show just how you think.
You're trying to cash in and profit off of 9/11.
You're George W bush without the charisma or contacts.
And ,ranx, do you have any pictures of the other side of WTC7?
|
| Oct 20th, 2006 01:17 PM |
| Rez |
WELL, MR OMNIBUS I got rid of that 'if you were right, they'd kill you by now' pile of ridiculousness for you
also, i have no obligation to be useful, and my lack of it as defined by you would only be offensive when i start threads about it. but in that last post it was useful in that it further illuminated for everyone here what a fucking nutjob geggy is
for now though, i'll keep popping in the door, much like kramer from seinfeld, and ask just how fat juttin is whenever someone makes a fat joke about him
so shut up
|
| Oct 20th, 2006 01:09 PM |
| AChimp |
I think Geggy needs to get a raging clue and point it in the direction of a brain.
|
| Oct 19th, 2006 06:38 PM |
| ranxer |
man, southpark has died for me since that 9-11 episode.. i listen patiently to people that are trying to explain how they support the 9-11 truth movement somehow but i sure didn't see it. i was offended... by a damned cartoon meh.
geggy yer a glutton for punishment.. like a hen argueing for vegetarianism in a foxden. gluk
|
| Oct 19th, 2006 10:52 AM |
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Rez, you are utterly useless.
|
| Oct 19th, 2006 02:37 AM |
| Rez |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Geggy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Preechr
Maybe it's just me being a Southerner, but these sorts of digs really get under my skin no matter who makes them or whom they're intended for...
Anyhoo, Geggy... Not to encourage you, but I think pretty much everybody in the world realizes that 9/12 was a day focused mostly on ass-covering by anyone even remotely involved with homeland security efforts. While this means there are certainly facts many many people will probably take to their graves about the attack, it doesn't mean there was some sort of great conspiracy by the government. Personally, I have good reason to believe there were explosives hidden in the towers before the attacks, and while I won't go into details about why I think that, I don't see why it's so easy for you to jump from A to Z and conclude the government is responsible because some of the information related to the attack has not been declassified... and may well never be.
The fact is, in most cases there is just no way of knowing for certain everything about anything. You are not a stupid person. That puts you ahead of more than half the human herd. I don't resent you for your views, no matter how crazy I think they may be, because I don't think you have an agenda behind believing as you do. I think you honestly believe this crap, even though most adults have accumulated enough human experiences to easily dismiss your allcaps conspiracy sites before they get three sentences in. THAT's why I find it hard to believe you are more than 18 years old.
This has to be the first thing you've ever realy involved yourself in intellectually. Maybe you really don't live in your parents' basement, but you definitely need to get out and develop a deeper understanding of the world before you go locking in on conspiracy obsessions. Crazy's just around the corner for you buddy. I can guarantee you a lifetime spent chasing this ghost will be a lifetime wasted on nothing but frustration. If I can reliably judge your IRL relationships by how you act here, I don't hold much hope for you on a personal level as long as you are on this quest. How bored your aquaintances and co-workers must be with your obssession... Do you judge your friendships solely on willingness to accept your theories on just this one thing?
|
I rarely talk about my obsession outside the internet because it's not worth losing my job, my friends, my home over. Everybody knows and respect my views on 9/11, there's no point in ranting on about it to them. Internet is a better source for reaching out the mass population. I do it during my leisure time rather than watching tv or if I don't have anything left to read on the internet. Also it's kind of exciting watching the world and the media evolve around about what I do. I'll stop doing it when it's over. I think bill hicks said it best
"I love talking about the Kennedy assasination. The reason I do is because I'm fascinated by it. I'm fascinated that our government could lie to us so blatantly, so obviously for so long, and we do absolutely nothing about it. I think that's interesting in what is ostensibly a democracy. Sarcasm, come on in. People say "Bill, quit talking about Kennedy man. It was a long time ago, just let it go, alright? It's a long time ago, just forget it." I'm like, alright, then don't bring up Jesus to me. As long as we're talking shelf life here..." |
hey, you're that guy whose uncle came out of the closet and ever since then you wondered if he ever jerked off over you as a young'un when he helped you brush your teeth
man, your reasoning is awful
|
| Oct 18th, 2006 11:06 PM |
| Abcdxxxx |
"Also it's kind of exciting watching the world and the media evolve around about what I do. "
Funniest thing I've read here, maybe ever.
Geggy, does it not worry you that this "obsession" has led you to parrot some incredibly backwards statements that stem from hatred and bias rather then merely some "search for the truth" ? When people assume you're a naive child on the internet, they're really giving you the benefit of the doubt, flattering you.
|
| Oct 18th, 2006 10:29 PM |
| Preechr |
So, you are saying you can let this go someday?
|
| Oct 18th, 2006 10:11 PM |
| Geggy |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Preechr
Maybe it's just me being a Southerner, but these sorts of digs really get under my skin no matter who makes them or whom they're intended for...
Anyhoo, Geggy... Not to encourage you, but I think pretty much everybody in the world realizes that 9/12 was a day focused mostly on ass-covering by anyone even remotely involved with homeland security efforts. While this means there are certainly facts many many people will probably take to their graves about the attack, it doesn't mean there was some sort of great conspiracy by the government. Personally, I have good reason to believe there were explosives hidden in the towers before the attacks, and while I won't go into details about why I think that, I don't see why it's so easy for you to jump from A to Z and conclude the government is responsible because some of the information related to the attack has not been declassified... and may well never be.
The fact is, in most cases there is just no way of knowing for certain everything about anything. You are not a stupid person. That puts you ahead of more than half the human herd. I don't resent you for your views, no matter how crazy I think they may be, because I don't think you have an agenda behind believing as you do. I think you honestly believe this crap, even though most adults have accumulated enough human experiences to easily dismiss your allcaps conspiracy sites before they get three sentences in. THAT's why I find it hard to believe you are more than 18 years old.
This has to be the first thing you've ever realy involved yourself in intellectually. Maybe you really don't live in your parents' basement, but you definitely need to get out and develop a deeper understanding of the world before you go locking in on conspiracy obsessions. Crazy's just around the corner for you buddy. I can guarantee you a lifetime spent chasing this ghost will be a lifetime wasted on nothing but frustration. If I can reliably judge your IRL relationships by how you act here, I don't hold much hope for you on a personal level as long as you are on this quest. How bored your aquaintances and co-workers must be with your obssession... Do you judge your friendships solely on willingness to accept your theories on just this one thing?
|
I rarely talk about my obsession outside the internet because it's not worth losing my job, my friends, my home over. Everybody knows and respect my views on 9/11, there's no point in ranting on about it to them. Internet is a better source for reaching out the mass population. I do it during my leisure time rather than watching tv or if I don't have anything left to read on the internet. Also it's kind of exciting watching the world and the media evolve around about what I do. I'll stop doing it when it's over. I think bill hicks said it best
"I love talking about the Kennedy assasination. The reason I do is because I'm fascinated by it. I'm fascinated that our government could lie to us so blatantly, so obviously for so long, and we do absolutely nothing about it. I think that's interesting in what is ostensibly a democracy. Sarcasm, come on in. People say "Bill, quit talking about Kennedy man. It was a long time ago, just let it go, alright? It's a long time ago, just forget it." I'm like, alright, then don't bring up Jesus to me. As long as we're talking shelf life here..."
|
| Oct 18th, 2006 10:01 PM |
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Geggy
Not just copy and paste articles, videos too.
|
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
