|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Mar 14th, 2006 06:27 PM | ||
| ScruU2wice | I become more compelled where he quotes my sentences twice but doesn't really give any logic or evidence either time. | |
| Mar 14th, 2006 06:07 PM | ||
| Spectre X | You're acting as if anyone actually ever really reads your posts. | |
| Mar 14th, 2006 05:01 PM | ||
| The One and Only... |
I need to clarify a point. That dinky shack that your family built? Yeah, that's going to remain the families. You live there; hence, you have been appropriating it; hence, it will transfer to the family when you die. The apartment complex Mr. Millionare built, however, might not. Quote:
|
|
| Mar 14th, 2006 02:36 PM | ||
| davinxtk |
Re: A more equitable property system? Quote:
TRADE WARS |
|
| Mar 14th, 2006 11:20 AM | ||
| sadie | from now on, i'm picturing kultureboy as boy george. | |
| Mar 13th, 2006 11:25 PM | ||
| ziggytrix |
Re: A more equitable property system? While we're at it, let's make it a rule that if I shoot you in the face, I get to have all your stuff. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 10:54 PM | ||
| Kulturkampf | Are you saying that my Kultur Klub barber shop is not going to happen? | |
| Mar 13th, 2006 07:28 PM | ||
| sspadowsky |
Know what the Philo board needs these days? More silly, hypothetical, idealistic, pseudo-intellectual bullshit scenarios that are never, ever, ever going to happen in a billion, gajillion years. Discuss. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 07:06 PM | ||
| Johnny Couth | That's a very cold way of looking at it. My family worked hard on this house for five years. It was a piece of shit shack when moved in. To think someone wouldn't inherit it just because you think some people have to much stuff is stupid. If I payed for something, I get to choose who gets it when I die. | |
| Mar 13th, 2006 06:43 PM | ||
| ScruU2wice |
Quote:
my point is just as valid as yours |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 06:11 PM | ||
| Kulturkampf |
I know what you mean, Zhukov, but what if say there is a family barber shop called "Kultur Klub" -- wouldn't it be appropriate that my kids, who grew up around it and maybe even helping herea nd there have the opportunity at inheritance? It is not evil. There should certainly be exceptions for family industires. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 05:15 PM | ||
| Zhukov |
I don't see much of a point in getting of rights after death while still maintaining private property. PS Kulchakampf; when people use the term 'private property', they are refering to land and factories. ie something that can produce - not baby photos. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 04:31 PM | ||
| AChimp |
Claiming a fat inheritance is my God-given right. Discuss. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 04:19 PM | ||
| The One and Only... |
Quote:
|
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 09:44 AM | ||
| Spectre X |
OAO you tool, shut your mouth. And Kultie, you shut yours, too. You're retarded and you don't even know. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 02:54 AM | ||
| Kulturkampf |
What if you want to give a present to someone when you die? I think it does extend because I might want to give a present to someone when I die. A present in my will. Maybe I would give some money to friends and family, or a photograph of me when I was young. Or even a baby picture. |
|
| Mar 13th, 2006 12:37 AM | ||
| ScruU2wice |
You believing and feeling are well with in the realm of objectivity. especially when you provide no logic or evidence No one having two houses fixes the economy? Please for the love of God take a rhetoric class.. |
|
| Mar 12th, 2006 11:57 PM | ||
| The One and Only... |
A more equitable property system? I propose that property rights do not extend, in any regard, unto death. Consider this example. A landlord dies. Under current conceptions of property, his tenement would go to whomever his will is directed; let's say his son. I propose that this tenement, upon the landlord's death, is immediately unclaimed material, and that its constituents have a legitimate right to claim it as their own via appropriation. By the same token, however, when the small farmer dies, his land is yielded over to his family, as it is they who are appropriating the land for use. In this sense, then, what I propose is very different from a death tax. I feel that extending property claims beyond death is nonsensical, inequitable, and economically inefficient. I believe it is responsible for innumerable greivances in this world. Discuss. |
|
