|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Nov 8th, 2004 04:11 PM | |||
| kellychaos |
Nothing civil about THAT union. 
|
||
| Nov 8th, 2004 02:55 AM | |||
| BlueOatmeal | Why the fuck would all the fags want tp go though the hellish nightmare that is marragie. If I was a fag I would be all like "Hey my fag lover we are not getting married!" I'm sure he would cry becuase thats what fags do, but I would just give him a strong anal pounding and everything would be fine. | ||
| Nov 7th, 2004 06:08 PM | |||
| executioneer | why in the fuck did you bump this shit old thread | ||
| Nov 7th, 2004 03:10 PM | |||
| XForeverMooreX |
- then of course the whole Gay Marriage thing comes up (which I totally support by that way) I also think that we spend way too much time worrying about other peoples sexuality nowadays... who cares! Sex and love are two great things... it shouldn't matter who you get it from < yes... that was a bit corny 
|
||
| Sep 15th, 2004 12:11 AM | |||
| The Retro Kat | Aw fuck. | ||
| Sep 14th, 2004 05:52 PM | |||
| Helm | Yeah you dirty fag | ||
| Sep 14th, 2004 04:07 PM | |||
| kellychaos | Helm can beat you up and shit. | ||
| Sep 13th, 2004 07:33 PM | |||
| The Retro Kat | I still don't have a chance with you, huh? | ||
| Sep 13th, 2004 12:32 PM | |||
| Helm | Retro Kat has become ten times more funny since he came out of the closet. Still not funny enough to be called funny, but hey. | ||
| Sep 12th, 2004 10:55 PM | |||
| The Retro Kat |
Quote:
 Gay Friend: You got problem with gays, cause im gay and can beat you up and shit. Davin: No. Gay Friend: Good, cause then we're fuckin. Davin: Shit. |
||
| Sep 12th, 2004 06:50 PM | |||
| Terra | :trickquestion | ||
| Sep 12th, 2004 02:17 PM | |||
| davinxtk | Were the people around here always this stupid? | ||
| Sep 12th, 2004 12:45 PM | |||
| Captain Goodtimes |
Yah retro, strop trying so hard to be gay 
|
||
| Sep 12th, 2004 06:24 AM | |||
| davinxtk |
Quote:
There's no specifically useful point in conversation to bring it up unless you're talking about sexuality. Or where you're going this evening. Or people you're seeing. Or highschool. Or any of a hundred topics where it might be useful for me to know that the guy or girl I'm speaking with prefers attention from guys, or girls respectively. Shut the fuck up and stop trying so hard. |
||
| Sep 12th, 2004 01:41 AM | |||
| Captain Goodtimes | Speaking of the cubs, they won today. Too bad they'll probably fuck up again. | ||
| Sep 12th, 2004 01:11 AM | |||
| The Retro Kat |
Quote:
Conversation with a gay "So, john, how about those cubbies?" "I'm gay." "Yeah, that's cool and shit, but stop beating around the bush." There is no specifically useful point in conversation to bring it up unless you're talking about homosexuality. |
||
| Sep 10th, 2004 04:02 PM | |||
| FartinMowler |
Quote:
|
||
| Sep 10th, 2004 03:53 PM | |||
| kellychaos |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
| Sep 10th, 2004 07:53 AM | |||
| Helm |
Quote:
Furthermore, being socially compatible with the other person is a plus, due to a deep-rooted concept of loneliness, that any sentient being feels. I'm not talking about goth bwah I am alone the darkness swallows me loneliness. I am talking about the substantial loneliness that occurs when a being first notes the dualistic division between 'self' and 'everything else'. When you understand that your mind is a world in to itself. Being able to communicate superficially with another human being creates the promise of more substantial communication on a level which sadly is impossible through words. So if the person you're having some success at communicating with is ugly, then you think 'friend'. If she's beautiful, you think 'mate'. You'd think 'mate' if she were beautiful and unconscious too, but if she's up and talking and making sense and willing, all the better. That's basically it. Obviously, there are a host of social neuroses and hang-ups that deal with the selection of mate and it's too much hassle (and honestly not completely in my ability) to document them now, like peer pressure, societal programming (hello, ladder theory) inappropriate handling by guardians etc Homosexual animals are to some extent cultivated genetic errors, as they, as animals fail on the second most important task of any organism, the production of offspring. From a biological standpoint, there is no other way to look at homosexuality. From a sociological and psychologic standpoint, things are more complicated. Homosexuals who have no genetic leaning towards finding same-sex partners attractive (and it is my oppinion that most people that claim to be gay nowdays are of this sort, rather than hopeless biological cases) have chosen a different 'club' to belong in than most, but still, they long for belonging all the same. And besides, if you have a sexually active prostate, homosexual intercourse one can get used to. Top that with how much easier it is to be in a same-sex relationship because you can communicate better, do not have to deal with sexual shyness, it's not difficult to be gay, today. People choose a lot of labels to identify with and so substantiate their existence. One of the most prominent labels one adopts relatively early in life is that of his gender. His sex is a given, but one is of a gender by choice. So if nothing else, a man in need of an idenity might as well go gay. Just as other people join tennis clubs and others say 'I'll be a writer now'. Therein lies the most horrible social neurosis of the modern man: The need to be thoroughly labeled. Humans are animals that crave safety. And because men (as opposed to animals) have an abstract understanding of the whole world (whereas animals rely on limited genetic memory and their sensory perception of their surroundings), they can never be safe until they've catalogued and priorized as much of the world as possible. And people are easier to understand when you just have to deal with their labels. And it's ironic because most people claim their 'individuality' being paramount. But the way most modern people become 'individuals' is by collecting as many labels as possible. It's a way to 'flesh out' yourself. Architect. Student. Visionary. Gay. Life's a fucking race and the one with the biggest description wins. So yeah, Fartin might not have the brain capacity to eloquently say what he's meaning, but there is a point that gay men and women make a point out of this particular label they've picked up. One can understand why. Being straight is hardly a label. It's presupposed, as fartin said. So when you want to aquire a new label, you broadcast it as much as possible. |
||
| Sep 10th, 2004 04:23 AM | |||
| davinxtk |
Quote:
My first post is a direct response to it. The point is, I've never seen people running around saying they were gay for no reason. Quote:
|
||
| Sep 9th, 2004 11:48 PM | |||
| The Retro Kat | I didn't really put a lot of time reading your posts davin, cause i already know what they are about anyways...absolute shit. Alls I got out of your post was that you got a boner when your 13 year old boyfriend seduced you when you were ten or some shit like that. Obviously you didn't put a lot of time reading the topic, either, or you would know what the fuck we were talking about. Fuck, you don't even know what the fuck you are talking about. Alls I know is DAVIN IS A BIG FLAMING PILE OF FAGGOT. | ||
| Sep 9th, 2004 06:12 PM | |||
| FartinMowler |
That was very nice Kelly (finally)  I would like to say one final thing...When I pointed out that I lived in a house and had to hear two guy's "going at it" and it was annoying only for the fact that I was alone in a strange house with nothing but one of those long lawn chairs to sleep on, clothes and some books. It could have been two women or a guy and girl that made noise and I would have been annoyed. I only met the guy a few times in the morning in the kitchen and we chatted. It was months later, after I moved out and I saw him and his friend at a local mall, that I knew he was sick... and then later met another room mate that told me that he passed away. that was in the early 90s. I hope everyone is as smart as me and wears a condom or some form of protection. Try your best to find a person that you will stay with until you die like me :/ |
||
| Sep 9th, 2004 04:13 PM | |||
| kellychaos | I prefer apathy to empathy. It's all part of Everything ... the whites, blacks, greys of sexuality ... over something that doesn't even involve the people that get so upset over it. It becomes white noise to me until the haters get involved and things like what happened to Mathew Shephard (sp?) occur. That's the worst face of humanity and I'll go to my grave not understanding it ... just as I don't understand homosexuality. In the case of homosexuality; however, I don't try to understand it because it is not FOR me to understand. It simply IS. I can't even understand the stimulus behind what attracts me to a certain kind of woman over another and I'm certainly not going to make the leap to get inside the mind of a homosexual much less try to stereotype them into one kind of personality profile. | ||
| Sep 9th, 2004 02:08 PM | |||
| hawaiian mage |
Actually, I think FartinMowler has a point. Gay people DO like to emphasise the differences between them and everyone else. It's proven by science. At least twice. |
||
| Sep 9th, 2004 10:31 AM | |||
| Helm | oh man what should i respond with guys i don't want to lose face here she's just a noob i don't want to lose this internet fight!! | ||
| This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | |||
