Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > Charges against saddam dropped
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: Charges against saddam dropped Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Jan 16th, 2007 04:56 PM
El Blanco
Quote:
He also alleged that Saddam made a deal with Washington before the 2003 invasion of Iraq to allow the United States to occupy the country without meeting any opposition.
Uhhhh......

OK, besides there obviously being opposition, what exactly has been Hussien's payoff?

And again, shtty job of silencing him. They put him on public trial in front of the media to rant all he wants.
Jan 16th, 2007 01:27 PM
Grislygus "Excuse me, sir, about Alexander Litvinenko..."

"THE UNITED STATES HAS BEING SILENCED SADDAM HUSSEIN! THIS IS TRAVESTY!"
Jan 16th, 2007 12:46 PM
Geggy Saddam Execution Rushed to Hide Information — Russian Ex-PM
Created: 15.01.2007 10:40 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 20:38 MSK


MosNews


The execution of Saddam Hussein was rushed to prevent the former Iraqi leader from revealing facts that could compromise the United States, former Russian prime minister Yevgeny Primakov has said.

Saddam was executed in an “unexpected” way so “he could not have the last word” and reveal compromising information on the relationship between the United States and his former regime, the PTI news agency quoted Primakov as saying in a televised interview on Sunday.

If Saddam Hussein “had said everything (he knew), the current United States president (George W Bush) would have been greatly embarrassed,” said Primakov, a Middle East expert formerly on good terms with Saddam.

Primakov highlighted the military cooperation between Washington and Baghdad during the 1980s when the United States was fighting the fundamentalist threat from Iran.

He also alleged that Saddam made a deal with Washington before the 2003 invasion of Iraq to allow the United States to occupy the country without meeting any opposition.

Primakov made two confidential visits to Iraq at the request of Russian President Vladimir Putin shortly before the US-led invasion of the country.

Saddam was executed for crimes against humanity on December 30, which coincided with the first day of the Eid al-Adha feast and drew widespread Muslim condemnation.


Oh really i did not know that duh
Jan 9th, 2007 02:20 PM
kahljorn "prove his innocense" and being innocent are different ;/ criminals plead innocent in court all the time and they're given a chance to prove it but it doesn't necessitate actually being innocent; it just means there's a trial where all evidence is submitted before they are commited guilty.
"Innocent until proven guilty" isn't as literal as it sounds ;/

also, I think geggy's more concerned with the evidence coming out in trial that would pin the US than he is with saddam actually being innocent.
Jan 9th, 2007 12:37 PM
derrida The killing of 150 men and boys in Dujail wasn't a genocidal act. And they didn't charge him for genocide for it. The genocide charge (applied to Saddam's anti-Kurdish campaigns), was one of the charges that was dropped.
Jan 9th, 2007 11:39 AM
ScruU2wice oh.
Jan 9th, 2007 10:45 AM
Grislygus They hung him for a single genocidal act, they're dropping charges for any other ones he may have committed.
Jan 9th, 2007 02:29 AM
ScruU2wice What did they execute him for if they're dropping the charges of the crime of genocide? I though that's why they hung him
Jan 9th, 2007 02:23 AM
Abcdxxxx "he was executed just before he could present a case in attempt to prove his innocence"
Jan 9th, 2007 01:14 AM
kahljorn yea, me either, but I could definitley see geggy trying to pass the buck from sadam to the United States.
Jan 9th, 2007 12:41 AM
derrida actually, i couldn't find the verb to be anywhere in that passage, nor really anything else proclaiming innocence. care to diagram?
Jan 8th, 2007 11:03 PM
Courage the Cowardly Dog
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geggy
Think about it saddam pled innocent to the genocide of kurds and in the most fortunate time for the US politicans, he was executed just before he could present a case in attempt to prove his innocence. In any case now saddam cannot reveal any unwished parts of history during the media attended trials that could implicate the americans who supplied the weapons and order the attack on iran. Good thing al-maliki, the all new iraq dictator installed by the bush administration, rejected all demands to stop the swift execution so he can protect his US buddies.
That's where you said he was innocent.
Jan 8th, 2007 10:52 PM
DehydratedPorkMan All I gotta say is...
"Whoops."
Jan 8th, 2007 10:44 PM
kahljorn that was mostly a rhetorical question.
Jan 8th, 2007 09:49 PM
Uncle_Sham the title.
Jan 8th, 2007 09:48 PM
Geggy Wait where did I say he was innocent?
Jan 8th, 2007 09:45 PM
Grislygus Oh, yeah. All of those screaming tantrums he had in court? Just a diversion until proving his innocence was a sure thing. I thought everybody knew that.

How old is Geggy, anyway?
Jan 8th, 2007 09:43 PM
Uncle_Sham he was hanged like this
Jan 8th, 2007 09:41 PM
Abcdxxxx Saddam's innocence? WHAT INNOCENCE, YOU IMBECILE?
Jan 8th, 2007 09:26 PM
Geggy Think about it saddam pled innocent to the genocide of kurds and in the most fortunate time for the US politicans, he was executed just before he could present a case in attempt to prove his innocence. In any case now saddam cannot reveal any unwished parts of history during the media attended trials that could implicate the americans who supplied the weapons and order the attack on iran. Good thing al-maliki, the all new iraq dictator installed by the bush administration, rejected all demands to stop the swift execution so he can protect his US buddies.
Jan 8th, 2007 08:34 PM
Courage the Cowardly Dog
Quote:
Originally Posted by kahljorn
My only question:

Are they pardoning anyone else or still charging them?
if you read the article everyone who is still alive is being charged.
Jan 8th, 2007 07:28 PM
kahljorn My only question:

Are they pardoning anyone else or still charging them?
Jan 8th, 2007 07:16 PM
El Blanco That would actually be really cool. Although, you wouldn't get the satisfying snap out of his neck anymore.
Jan 8th, 2007 07:03 PM
Courage the Cowardly Dog Oh yeah to silence him from telling the world what they already know. Cause the guy who supplied the gun that Dick Cheney used to shoot his lawyer, HE is responsible and the man who killed hundreds of thousands of people IS TOTALLY INNOCENT!

BTW they aren't pardoning him they are merely not trying him cause he is already dead and it is a waste of time. They can't dig him up and hang him again.

dumbass.
Jan 8th, 2007 04:39 PM
Abcdxxxx It's their version of impeaching a President and then pardoning him several years later. It's the whole "here's your honor through death, then we'll forgive you" code.
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.