|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Jan 20th, 2004 10:39 AM | |
| mburbank | While Iowa is not always irrellivant (see Jimmy Carter) it often is. Especially concidering some of the candidates didn't even participate. |
| Jan 19th, 2004 11:24 PM | |
| Drew Katsikas |
 silly kerry :P  ALMOST THE WINNAR[/img] |
| Jan 19th, 2004 11:20 PM | |
| theapportioner |
NH is the first primary, on the 27th I think. Not sure how many other states do caucases. I wonder if this is going to trigger a huge collapse for Dean. For the longest time he was the only one with any sort of momentum, and now a bunch of others have it. And I think a lot of people voiced their support for Dean -only- because he had the momentum. Clark or Kerry might even take NH, but I think it'll probably be all Clark once the primaries move south, if Dean continues to lose ground... Also, looks like Gephardt's done. |
| Jan 19th, 2004 11:09 PM | |
| Drew Katsikas | truly shocking. I'm pleased. I was never a Dean guy, and I think it's just becuase the caucus guys realize he's not able to beat Bush. Are there multiple homes where the caucuses take place? I imagine there would be. And, am I right in beliving that NH is a caucus, too? When do the primaries take place, or do they all happen under the Dem convetion here in Boston? |
| Jan 19th, 2004 10:15 PM | |
| theapportioner |
Iowa What about Kerry. Wow. Thought he was a goner for sure. Edwards came out of nowhere too. Dean's in some trouble. |
