Features

Comrade Rocket · #1

I just rented the one from the 1960s. It was a sad movie that had a good story and i might have to go see the new one even though it looks like crap. Its a good thing i can get into most films for free.

Gives walk lightly and carry a big stick a new meaning.

JeefGyle · #2

You're gay

Ghost of Fraiser · #3

SO this is how people from california watch movies.

ArrowX · #4

they get a ob at the theater then deserttheir post to go watch movies. No wonder whythere are never more than 4 out of the 10 cash registers open.

Zebra 3 · #5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Comrade Rocket

I just rented the one from the 1960s. It was a sad movie that had a good story and i might have to go see the new one even though it looks like crap.

The original Walking Tall (1973) is so much better.

Comrade Rocket · #6

thats kinda what the point of this thread was, but that seems to have been lost.

Anonymous · #7

I liked the new one. Fag.

mburbank · #8

Do they change his name in the new one or is he still Bufford Pusser?

Anonymous · #9

He's called Chris-something in this one.

mburbank · #10

See, now, I think that's just wrong. The actual guy the movies are based on was named Bufford Pusser, and I think he was played in the original movies by the wonderful Joe Don Baker.

If you can be played by Joe Don Baker and named Bufford Pusser, and you still walk tall, you are a tall walkinging guy.

THAT is the point this movie should be making.

No apsersions cast upon the Rock. I personally think his chracter could be named Bufford Pusser and he would STILL walk tall.