The WORST PERSON EVER contest

[Jixby Phillips]

I am running something in Mock Wars called the "Worst Person Ever" contest.

The idea is we compile a list of people to be considered for the title of "WORST PERSON EVER." We have a tournament where each person is matched against another. Everybody can participate in arguing over who is worse, supplying evidence, etc. Voting is held at the end of each round. Whoever wins gets to advance to the next round.

I'm trying to think of ideas to keep each round fresh; I mean, the idea of getting evidence might be cool, but what do we do after the first round? Supply the same evidence that we did before? I guess people would have to dig much deeper as the contest went on. But I'm still concerned things would get repetitive. Maybe "evidence" can only be allowed durring later rounds, the first couple rounds being just discussion? This would depend on how many contestants/rounds there is going to be.

Right now I am just gathering possible contestants.

http://www.i-mockery.net/viewtopic.php?t=12551

Give me your lists of horrible people in that thread.

[Matt Harty]

I'm trying to think of ideas to keep each round fresh; I mean, the idea of getting evidence might be cool, but what do we do after the first round? Supply the same evidence that we did before? I guess people would have to dig much deeper as the contest went on.

Well you could keep the rounds really short, but the amount of posts you can dig up of a person is endless.

[ProfessorCool]

It would be kinda like I Love The 80s but like "I Hate THIS GUY"