|
BANNED
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
|
|

Sep 15th, 2003, 08:01 PM
Whoever said Buddhism doesnt have proof in history is obviously slightly retarded. He was a prince. Princes are important. Princes are in History. There are historical thingimajigs to prove he existed. Thingimajigs. There are also, I believe, stored in tibet shit that he wrote in, or spit in, or threw manure in, I'm not sure, but it wouldn't perprise me.
Buddha's real name was not buddha, go read your bookikins. Just like Jesus Christ's real name wasn't the Christ, they are titles. Sort of like Sir, or King, or FuckingjackassrabbitcapitolTminusafuckingZ
|
__________________
NEVER
|
|
|