Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Grislygus Grislygus is offline
Ancient Mariner
Grislygus's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Grislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contest
Old Oct 25th, 2006, 03:01 PM        How To Be A Conspiracy Theorist
Are you a conspiracy theorist? Do you have problems getting the "sheeple" to believe you? Fear not, for the measly sum of one college credit, you can completely revamp your delivery style!

YES! It's true! You can join the nationwide movement and reinvent yourself, all through using a standard English education! But don't take MY word for it! Here's a taste of what an English writing class can give you!

Quote:
Logical Fallacies are errors or flaws in reasoning. Although essentially unsound, fallacious arguments seem superficially plausible and have great persuasive power. Fallacies are not necessarily deliberate attempts to decieve readers. Writers may introduce a fallacy accidentally by not examining their own reasons or underlying assumptions critically. Here is a summary of the most common logical fallacies (Listed Alphabetically).

-Begging the question: Arguing a claim is true by repeating the claim in different words (sometimes called circular reasoning).

-Confusing chronology with casuality: Assuming that because one thing proceeded another, the former caused the latter (also called post hoc, ergo propter hoc).

-Either-or reasoning: Assuming that there are only two sides to a question and representing yours as the only correct one.

-Equivocating: Misleading or hedging with ambiguous word choices.

-Failing to accept the burden of proof: Asserting a claim without presenting a reasoned argument to support it.

-False analogy: Assuming because one thing resembles another, conclusions drawn from one can also apply to the other.

-Hasty generalization: Offering only weak or limited evidence to support a conclusion.

-Overreliance on authority: Assuming that an authority is true simply because an expert says so and ignoring evidence to the contrary.

-Oversimplifying: Giving easy answers to complicated questions, often by appealing to emotions rather than logic.

-Slanting: Selecting or emphasizing the evidence that supports your claim and suppressing or playing down other evidence.

-Slippery slope: Pretending that one thing inevitably leads to another.

-Sob story: Manipulating readers' emotions to lead them to draw unjustified conclusions.

-Straw man: Directing the argument against a claim nobody actually makes, or agrees that is very weak.
Contact your local college now!
__________________
IT'S A GOOFY BALL, MATTHEW. NOT A SUPER COMPUTER.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.