If you mean using the ANSWER banner is a new phenomenon then you're right... but the Workers World Party aren't new. While ANSWER might not be the most beloved, their rallies are widely attended, and uniformely supported, even by their critics. Is it enough to stand in a unified hatred against Bush when your standing alongside those who have supported people like Milosevic?
The point being, these organizations have agendas (because that's what organizations do!) and there is no reason that these politically righteous groups should attempt to water down, or hide their true politics if they truly believe their cause is just....really why should they feel the need to dupe or confuse their supporters? The movement is supposed to be made up of socially conscious and informed people, not pawns. This moral question exists with or without a Bush in the world.
Seriously, two days after the bombing stops, people without natural resources are marching in a country where un-sanctioned assembly is outlawed, their dictatorship government is still un-accounted for, and in several areas, still under Saddam's control....and just by pure inspired hatred for Bush, thousands found markers, large banners, and carried the ecxact duplicate of signs being used by organized and advertised protests in several nations.... all because the wonder that is the internet?????
Also who are Indymedia backed by? Someone told me and I've actually forgotten.
Miss Modular 
Hybrid Mode
