Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Jan 14th, 2005, 04:57 PM       
How can one see someone like this:

Quote:
Hastert, in a prepared statement, said Buyer is "someone who has real-world veterans experience" and "understands the issues confronting today's veterans when they return home from fighting the war on terror."
as being more effective than someone like this:

Quote:
Smith also is expected to lose his seat on the veterans panel, which he has held for 24 years.

I don't care how much more combat experience you've had, it doesn't make you more effective than someone who knows the administration, the channels, the connections, ect. So why, after 24 years, is this man let to even though he's been effective ahd has been moving up the promotion trail for years. Maybe it's precisely the knowledge, experience and position of authority to actually call Bush on the dumb shit he does and/or says with the full confidence that his voice will be heard by a wide audience. Didn't the Bush administration let some senior intelligence secretary (who worked through several administrations) go months ago after which he immediately wrote a book about national security. Seems that we have a trend here.
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.