Quote:
|
Originally Posted by El Blanco
I said I disagreed with the descicion. But, I also realized why it was made.
So, you think because it can be abused, NL should be left to rot away? Don't the people of the town have the right to try and save themselves? How else does that happen without a bussiness coming and expanding, bringing jobs with it?
|
the supreme court should have refused point blank to even take the case. the connecticut court already ruled in favor of the local governement, why bring it to the US supreme court for them to make it a NATIONAL PRECEDENT? something that now all local governments can point to to justify why a Target is needed?
i think this is the first time i ever agreed with rhenquist, thomas, AND scalia.
wierd.
EDIT:
Quote:
|
Actually, ya. This ruling has been stated to be for this specific case only. Its not going to be used as precedent to increased ED. The notes of the Justices state this.
|
oh.
out of curiosity where did you find it? i actually slogged through a lot of that shit because i couldn't believe myself, but i didnt see anywhere that this was not meant to set a precedent.
Threaded Mode