Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Oct 28th, 2007, 11:41 AM       
So forest companies, private entities meant to make profit for their shareholders... Must do official government bidding? Sounds like socialism if I ever heard it.

Canada has officially adopted a policy of forest thinning because it does prevent extreme forest fires. You can argue a lot but you are arguing against lawmakers in Canada and the US which have adopted such policies -- and in this circumstance, policies which saved lives.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
derrida derrida is offline
Member
derrida's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
derrida is probably a spambot
Old Oct 28th, 2007, 12:48 PM       
what's so unreasonable about expecting a timber company to perform preventative maintenance on stocks of land so as to prevent loss of those resources? the government spending money to do things which should be done by the private sector? sounds like socialism to me.

forest thinning is necessary as it stands but only because natural burn cycles have been disrupted.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.