Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Grislygus Grislygus is offline
Ancient Mariner
Grislygus's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Grislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contestGrislygus won the popularity contest
Old Mar 13th, 2010, 05:09 PM       
So if you're attacking global warming "from the left", then how come you're using a spectacularly dense argument that I've seen used, VERBATIM, by Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly on their respective programs in the last month alone?



GEE DA SCIENTISTS SAID DAT OVERADUNDANT CARBON AND DUH CO2 LEVELS CAN THEORETICALLY AID IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LONG-TERM NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES. THEY MUST BE CLAIMING DAT ITS UH POLLUTANT HUH HUH HUH WHAT A BUNCH OF TOOLS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
TheCoolinator TheCoolinator is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mean Streets of New York
TheCoolinator is probably a spambot
Old Mar 15th, 2010, 09:33 AM       
Linked to global warming thread

Last edited by TheCoolinator : Mar 15th, 2010 at 11:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.