Global Warming

[TheCoolinator]

Originally Posted by Zhukov

It may well be an ingenious and insidious plan, but does the existence of such a plan refute that climate change is actually happening?

The changing of the climate is a natural cycle unaffected by Mankind. As I said previously, They own and operate the man made global warming hypothesis. Meaning it's been a fabrication from the beginning.

but does it automatically follow that the climate change movement is based on faulty science, or lies?

As I said above, the "movement" is completely sythetic. It's a ruling class ideology that has been forced upon emotionally fragile individuals who have no knowledge of past climate patterns. If you scroll up a bit you will see a chart and a quote that both point out that in certain parts of history CO2 levels were 10x as high and the earth was not warming. The chart also shows that even when CO2 levels drop the global temperature stays the same.

Oh, and are you saying that climatologists should be elected?

No, I'm just pointing out that the IPCC is a unaccountable agency that was created to prope up the myth of man made global warming.

[Zhukov]

Originally Posted by TheCoolinator

The changing of the climate is a natural cycle unaffected by Mankind. As I said previously, They own and operate the man made global warming hypothesis. Meaning it's been a fabrication from the beginning.

That's not an affirmative or a negative in response to my question. Does the existence of whomever you are toting as the 'they' at this stage "owning" the global warming hypothesis actually prove the non-existence of global warming on a scientific level?

If, as I, and logic, suspects, the answer is no; then please stop using "The ruling class is making a mint out of the global warming lie" as an argument against the existence of global warming.

The ruling class owning the 'Climate Change Movement' =/= Climate change is not happening.